ArticleGenomics, proteomics & bioinformatics2023
GREPore-seq: A Robust Workflow to Detect Changes After Gene Editing Through Long-range PCR and Nanopore Sequencing.
Article in Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- N6-methyladenosine: a key regulator in ocular disease mechanisms and treatment.Cell death discovery · 2025Review
- Single-guide RNA Cas9 and enhanced-deletion Cas9 rescue a recurrentMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2025Article
- Optimization of CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing System in Sheep (International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Enhancing hemophilia A gene therapy by strategic F8 deletions in AAV vectors.Blood science (Baltimore, Md.) · 2025Article
- Detecting haplotype-specific transcript variation in long reads with FLAIR2.Genome biology · 2024Article
- OliTag-seq enhances in cellulo detection of CRISPR-Cas9 off-targets.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Decoding the complexity of on-target integration: characterizing DNA insertions at the CRISPR-Cas9 targeted locus using nanopore sequencing.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Unintended CRISPR-Cas9 editing outcomes: a review of the detection and prevalence of structural variants generated by gene-editing in human cells.Human genetics · 2023Review
- In search of an ideal template for therapeutic genome editing: A review of current developments for structure optimization.Frontiers in genome editing · 2023Review
- Improved and Flexible HDR Editing by Targeting Introns in iPSCs.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To achieve the enormous potential of gene-editing technology in clinical therapies, one needs to evaluate both the on-target efficiency and unintended editing consequences comprehensively. However, there is a lack of a pipelined, large-scale, and economical workflow for detecting genome editing outcomes, in particular insertion or deletion of a large fragment. Here, we describe an approach for efficient and accurate detection of multiple genetic changes after CRISPR/Cas9 editing by pooled nanopore sequencing of barcoded long-range PCR products. Recognizing the high error rates of Oxford nanopore sequencing, we developed a novel pipeline to capture the barcoded sequences by grepping reads of nanopore amplicon sequencing (GREPore-seq). GREPore-seq can assess nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ)-mediated double-stranded oligodeoxynucleotide (dsODN) insertions with comparable accuracy to Illumina next-generation sequencing (NGS). GREPore-seq also reveals a full spectrum of homology-directed repair (HDR)-mediated large gene knock-in, correlating well with the fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis results. Of note, we discovered low-level fragmented and full-length plasmid backbone insertion at the CRISPR cutting site. Therefore, we have established a practical workflow to evaluate various genetic changes, including quantifying insertions of short dsODNs, knock-ins of long pieces, plasmid insertions, and large fragment deletions after CRISPR/Cas9-mediated editing. GREPore-seq is freely available at GitHub (https://github.com/lisiang/GREPore-seq) and the National Genomics Data Center (NGDC) BioCode (https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/biocode/tools/BT007293).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.