Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35752158›Full record

ReviewInternational immunology2022

Neutrophils in homeostasis and tissue repair.

Hanjoo Brian Shim, Justin F Deniset, Paul Kubes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Innate Immune Protection Against HIV in the Female Genital Tract.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Neutrophils at the Maternal-Fetal Interface: Agents of Protection or Destruction?American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hanjoo Brian ShimDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N1,Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2866-8099
Justin F DenisetDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N1,Canada.
Paul KubesDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N1,Canada.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neutrophils are the most abundant innate immune cell and are equipped with highly destructive molecular cargo. As such, these cells were long thought to be short-lived killer cells that unleash their full cytotoxic programs on pathogens following infection and on host bystander cells after sterile injury. However, this view of neutrophils is overly simplistic and as a result is outdated. Numerous studies now collectively highlight neutrophils as far more complex and having a host of homeostatic and tissue-reparative functions. In this review, we summarize these underappreciated roles across organs and injury models.

Indexed as

NeutrophilsWound HealingCell CommunicationHomeostasisHumansImmunity, InnateInflammationKiller Cells, Naturalgranulocytesimmunityinflammationsteady state

Identifiers

PMID35752158
PMCPMC9317988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.