Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35751974›Full record

ArticleVirology2022

Immunogenicity of candidate SARS-CoV-2 DNA vaccines based on the spike protein.

Heeji Lim, Se Eun Kim, Yun Ha Lee, Yun-Ho Hwang, Su Hwan Kim, Mi Young Kim, Gyung Tae Chung, You-Jin Kim, Dokeun Kim, Jung-Ah Lee

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Heeji LimCenter for Vaccine Research, National Institute of Infectious Disease, National Institute of Health, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, CheongJu, Chungcheongbuk-do, 29160, Republic of Korea.
Se Eun KimCenter for Vaccine Research, National Institute of Infectious Disease, National Institute of Health, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, CheongJu, Chungcheongbuk-do, 29160, Republic of Korea.
Yun Ha LeeNational Institute of Health, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, CheongJu, Chungcheongbuk-do, 29160, Republic of Korea.
Yun-Ho HwangCenter for Vaccine Research, National Institute of Infectious Disease, National Institute of Health, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, CheongJu, Chungcheongbuk-do, 29160, Republic of Korea.
Su Hwan KimCenter for Vaccine Research, National Institute of Infectious Disease, National Institute of Health, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, CheongJu, Chungcheongbuk-do, 29160, Republic of Korea.
Mi Young KimNational Institute of Health, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, CheongJu, Chungcheongbuk-do, 29160, Republic of Korea.
Gyung Tae ChungNational Institute of Health, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, CheongJu, Chungcheongbuk-do, 29160, Republic of Korea.
You-Jin KimCenter for Vaccine Research, National Institute of Infectious Disease, National Institute of Health, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, CheongJu, Chungcheongbuk-do, 29160, Republic of Korea.
Dokeun KimCenter for Vaccine Research, National Institute of Infectious Disease, National Institute of Health, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, CheongJu, Chungcheongbuk-do, 29160, Republic of Korea.
Jung-Ah LeeCenter for Vaccine Research, National Institute of Infectious Disease, National Institute of Health, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, CheongJu, Chungcheongbuk-do, 29160, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: jaylee1550@korea.kr.
Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency · KRKorea National Institute of Health · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 caused by the novel human severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is currently a major threat to public health worldwide. To deal with the needs of vaccine, we developed four DNA vaccine candidates against SARS-CoV-2, based on the full-length spike (S) or truncated S protein. Following mice vaccination, we measured T-cell response and antigen-specific neutralizing antibody (NAb) titer. All four candidates induced humoral immune responses, including elevated levels of total IgG and NAbs, and cell-mediated immune responses, including multiple cytokine expression. However, the full-length S DNA vaccine enhanced the immune responses most significantly. We then evaluated its appropriate antigen dose and vaccination schedule. Although all immunized groups showed higher immune response than the control group, inoculation with 50 μg antigen led to the highest NAb titer. Immunity was significantly increased after the third inoculation. Thus, the full-length S DNA vaccine can potentially prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Indexed as

COVID-19Vaccines, DNAViral VaccinesAnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansMiceSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusVaccinationAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2Vaccines, DNAViral VaccinesDNA vaccineSARS-CoV-2Spike protein

Identifiers

PMID35751974
PMCPMC9185170
OpenAlexW4281649224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.