ArticlePediatric neurology2022
Genetic Testing and Hospital Length of Stay in Neonates With Epilepsy.
Article in Pediatric neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identifying characteristics associated with genetic testing in the NICU.Journal of community genetics · 2025Article
- Acute symptomatic seizures in newborns: a narrative review.Acta epileptologica · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe evaluated changes in genetic testing for neonatal-onset epilepsy and associated short-term outcomes over an 8-year period among a cohort of patients in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) at a single institution before and after the introduction of sponsored genetic epilepsy testing in January 2018.
methodsOur primary outcome was a change in length of stay (LOS) after 2018. We also ascertained severity of illness with the Neonatal Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (nSOFA), type and result of genetic testing, turnaround time to molecular diagnosis (TAT), LOS, antiseizure medications (ASMs), and use of technology at discharge. We compared outcomes using nonparametric tests and difference-in-difference analysis.
resultsFifty-three infants with genetic testing were included; 20 infants were tested after 2018. A total of 4160 infants in the NICU without genetic testing were used as reference. In the genetic testing group, LOS was 25 days (interquartile range [IQR] 5, 49) pre-2018 and 19 days (IQR 6, 19) post-2018 (P < 0.001 when compared with the reference population in the difference-in-difference analysis). TAT decreased from 51 days to 17 days after 2018 (P = 0.003). ASM number decreased from 4 (IQR 2, 5) to 2 post-2018 (IQR 1, 3) (P = 0.02). Over the same time periods there was no significant change in birth weight, maximum nSOFA score, or technology dependence.
conclusionsIn this cohort, changes in genetic testing for neonatal-onset epilepsy were associated with shorter LOS that was not explained by changes in severity of illness, birth weight, or the average LOS in the NICU over time. Validation of these results in a larger, multicenter sample size is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.