ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2022
Decoding of attentional state using local field potentials.
Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Orbitofrontal High-Gamma Reflects Spike-Dissociable Value and Decision Mechanisms.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Article
- Dissociation of attentional state and behavioral outcome using local field potentials.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- [Effects of 50 Hz electromagnetic field on rat working memory and investigation of neural mechanisms].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2023Article
- Chronic Stability of Local Field Potentials Using Amorphous Silicon Carbide Microelectrode Arrays Implanted in the Rat Motor Cortex.Micromachines · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We review recent efforts to decode visual spatial attention from different types of brain signals, such as spikes and local field potentials (LFPs). Combining signals from more electrodes improves decoding, but the pattern of improvement varies considerably depending on the signal as well as the task (for example, decoding of sensory stimulus/motor intention versus location of attention). We argue that this pattern of results conveys important information not only about the usefulness of a particular brain signal for decoding attention, but also about the spatial scale over which attention operates in the brain. The spatial scale, in turn, likely depends on the extent of underlying mechanisms such as normalization, gain control via excitation-inhibition interactions, and neuromodulatory regulation of attention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.