Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35751860›Full record

Observational studyDiabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association2022

The impact of socio-economic deprivation on access to diabetes technology in adults with type 1 diabetes.

Ciara Fallon, Emma Jones, Nick Oliver, Monika Reddy, Parizad Avari

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Narrative Review: Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) in Older Adults with Diabetes.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ciara FallonDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Emma JonesDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Nick OliverDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3525-3633
Monika ReddyDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Parizad AvariDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9047-3589

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith advances in technology, there is an emerging concern that inequalities exist in provision and diabetes outcomes in areas of greater deprivation. We assess the relationship between socio-economic status and deprivation with access to diabetes technology and their outcomes in adults with type 1 diabetes.

methodsRetrospective, observational analysis of adults attending a tertiary centre, comprising three urban hospitals in the UK. Socio-economic deprivation was assessed by the English Indices of Deprivation 2019. Data analysis was performed using one-way ANOVAs and chi-squared tests.

resultsIn total, 1631 adults aged 44 ± 15 years and 758 (47%) women were included, with 391 (24%) using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion, 312 (19%) using real-time continuous glucose monitoring and 558 (34%) using intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring. The highest use of diabetes technology was in the least deprived quintile compared to the most deprived quintile (67% vs. 45%, respectively; p < 0.001). HbA

conclusionsAdults living in the most deprived quintile had less technology use. Irrespective of socio-economic status or ethnicity, glycaemia was positively affected in all groups. It is imperative that health disparities are further addressed.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1AdultBlood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSocial ClassSocioeconomic FactorsTechnologyBlood Glucosecontinuous glucose monitoringdiabetes technologyhealth inequalitiessocio-economic deprivationstructured educationtype 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID35751860
PMCPMC9544624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.