Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35751828›Full record

Observational studyMedical & biological engineering & computing2022

Machine learning algorithm to evaluate risk factors of diabetic foot ulcers and its severity.

Rachita Nanda, Abhigyan Nath, Suprava Patel, Eli Mohapatra

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Diabetic foot care: full-lifecycle management driven by digital intelligent technologies].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Personalized prediction of diabetic foot ulcer recurrence in elderly individuals using machine learning paradigms.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rachita NandaDepartment of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Pin, Raipur, 492099, Chhattisgarh, India. dr.rachitananda@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6808-6176
Abhigyan NathDepartment of Biochemistry, Medical Biotechnology Division, Pt. Jawahar Lal Nehru Memorial College, Raipur, India. abhigyannath01@gmail.com.
Suprava PatelDepartment of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Pin, Raipur, 492099, Chhattisgarh, India.
Eli MohapatraDepartment of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Pin, Raipur, 492099, Chhattisgarh, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Raipur · INPt. Jawahar Lal Nehru Memorial Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early identification of the risk factors associated with development of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) can be facilitated using machine learning techniques. The aim of this study is to find out the association of various clinical and biochemical risk factors with DFU and develop a prediction model using different machine learning algorithms. Eighty each of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with DFU and (T2DM) without DFU were enrolled for this observational study. Clinical and laboratory data were analysed using different machine learning algorithms: Support vector machines (SVM-Poly K), Naive Bayes (NB), K-nearest neighbour (KNN), random forest (RF) and three ensemble learners: Stacking C, Bagging and AdaBoost for constructing prediction models for discriminating between the two groups (stage I classification) and ulcer type classification (stage II classification). Ensemble learning performed better than individual classifiers in terms of various performance evaluation metrics. New risk factors like ApoA1 and IL-10 for development of DFU in diabetes mellitus were identified. IL-10 along with uric acid could discriminate the grades of ulcers according to its severity. Decision fusion strategy using Stacking C algorithm resulted in enhanced prediction accuracy for both the stages of classification which can be used as a complementary method for computational screening for DFU and its subtypes. Current methodology for T2DM with DFU/T2DM without DFU and ulcer type classification.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic FootAlgorithmsBayes TheoremHumansInterleukin-10Machine LearningRisk FactorsSupport Vector MachineInterleukin-10ApoA1IL-10NeuropathyPlasma glucoseStacking C, Random forest, Feature selection

Identifiers

PMID35751828
OpenAlexW4283452396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.