Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35751825›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

Preanalytical Variables and Sample Quality Control for Clinical Variant Analysis.

Ilaria Alborelli, Philip M Jermann

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ilaria AlborelliInstitute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Philip M JermannInstitute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland. philipmartin.jermann@usb.ch.
University Hospital of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Broad molecular profiling by next-generation sequencing of solid tumors has become a critical tool for clinical decision-making in the era of precision oncology. In addition to many already approved targeted therapies, more than half of ongoing oncology-related clinical trials are biomarker-driven. Therefore, accurate and reliable assays are needed to assess the genetic make-up of tumor cells and guide clinicians in the therapy decision process. In order to obtain high-quality NGS data for variant detection, certain preanalytical steps and quality metrics should be followed. These include assessment of sample types, choice of extraction method, library preparation technology, sequencing platform, and finally sequencing quality control. Each of these steps has certain challenges and pitfalls that need to be addressed and overcome, respectively. In this chapter, we address the preanalytical quality control and how each of the involved steps may influence the final result. Following these guidelines and QC metrics may help in obtaining optimal results that will allow the precise and robust assessment of genetic variants in a clinical setting.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsGene LibraryHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansPrecision MedicineQuality ControlctDNAFFPELiquid biopsyMolecular pathologyNext-generation sequencingPreanalytical variableVariant calling

Identifiers

PMID35751825
OpenAlexW4285209792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.