Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35751674›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2023

Can false denials turn fact into fiction? The effect of false denials on memory for self-performed actions.

Charlotte A Bücken, Henry Otgaar, Ivan Mangiulli, Niki Ramakers, Harald Merckelbach

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Charlotte A BückenLeuven Institute of Criminology, Faculty of Law and Criminology, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. charlotte.buecken@kuleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5128-8348
Henry OtgaarLeuven Institute of Criminology, Faculty of Law and Criminology, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2782-2181
Ivan MangiulliLeuven Institute of Criminology, Faculty of Law and Criminology, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5409-7325
Niki RamakersForensic Psychology Section, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Harald MerckelbachForensic Psychology Section, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5116-7826

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 11K3121NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek G0D3621NKU Leuven STG/18/011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined the mnemonic effects of falsely denying a self-performed action. Specifically, participants (N = 30) performed, imagined, or received no instruction about 24 action statements (e.g., "cross your arms"). Next, their memory for whether they had performed, imagined, or did nothing (i.e., received no instructions) with these actions was tested. Subsequently, participants were instructed to repeatedly deny an action they had performed (false denial) and to repeatedly claim to have performed an action they had only imagined (false admission). In a final sorting memory task, 54% (n = 16) of participants erroneously indicated, after false admissions, that they had performed the imagined action. None of the participants indicated that they had only imagined an action after false denials, showing that it might be difficult to forget a performed action, even after repeatedly denying it. The current experiment sets the stage for future research to investigate why it seems to be difficult to forget performed actions.

Indexed as

MemoryMental RecallHumansImagination

Identifiers

PMID35751674
PMCPMC10017604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read2
measurements read21
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.