Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35751672›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2023

Adjustable Continence Therapy (ACT®) balloons to treat female stress urinary incontinence: effectiveness, safety and risk factors of failure and complication.

Marie-Liesse de Guerry, Amélie Demeestere, Christophe Bergot, Astrid de Hauteclocque, Juliette Hascoet, Anne-Sophie Bajeot, Camille Ternynck, Xavier Gamé, Benoît Peyronnet, Grégoire Capon and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Adjustable continence therapy (ProACT/ACTTranslational andrology and urology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Marie-Liesse de GuerryUniversity of Lille, Department of Urology, CHU Lille, F-59000, Lille, France.
Amélie DemeestereUniversity of Lille, Department of Urology, CHU Lille, F-59000, Lille, France.
Christophe BergotDepartment of Urology, CHU Nantes, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France.
Astrid de HauteclocqueDepartment of Urology, CHU Bordeaux, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Juliette HascoetDepartment of Urology, CHU Rennes, Université de Rennes, Rennes, France.
Anne-Sophie BajeotDepartment of Urology, CHU Rangueil, Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, Toulouse, France.
Camille TernynckDepartment of Biostatistics, CHU Lille, 59000, Lille, France.
Xavier GaméDepartment of Urology, CHU Rangueil, Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, Toulouse, France.
Benoît PeyronnetDepartment of Urology, CHU Rennes, Université de Rennes, Rennes, France.
Grégoire CaponDepartment of Urology, CHU Bordeaux, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Marie-Aimée Perrouin-VerbeDepartment of Urology, CHU Nantes, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France.
Xavier BiardeauUniversity of Lille, Department of Urology, CHU Lille, F-59000, Lille, France. biardeau.xavier@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1270-7401
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes · FRNantes Université · FRUniversité de Bordeaux · FRUniversité de Lille · FRUniversité Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisTo assess the effectiveness, safety and risk factors of failure and complications associated with Adjustable Continence Therapy (ACT®) balloons as a treatment for female stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

methodsIn the present multicentric retrospective study, all women implanted with ACT® balloons between 2000 and 2018 were considered eligible. Effectiveness and safety were assessed at 1 year, and risk factors for failure and complications were sought. The effectiveness was categorized into three distinct groups: Success = maximum 1 pad/day and patient's impression of improvement using a numerical rating scale (NRS) ≥ 8/10; Improvement = decrease of daily pad use and NRS ≥ 5/10; Failure = increase or stability of daily pad use or NRS < 5/10. The intra- and postoperative surgical complications were collected.

resultsOver the study period, 281 women were included. Among them, 104 (37.0%), 94 (33.5%) and 83 (29.5%) were categorized as success, improvement, and failure, respectively. Intra-, early and late postoperative complications occurred in 13 (4.6%), 35 (12.5%) and 75 (26.7%) women, respectively. Most early surgical complications were minor according to the Dindo-Clavien classification. Of women that presented a late postoperative surgical complication, 64 (22.8%) underwent an explantation performed under local or general anesthesia without associated sequalae.

conclusionsThe short-term effectiveness associated with ACT® balloons, their minimally invasive implantation and the frequent but easily manageable and sequelae-free complications suggest that they should be part of the therapeutic arsenal for female SUI.

Indexed as

Urinary Incontinence, StressUrinary Sphincter, ArtificialFemaleHumansProstheses and ImplantsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeCompression deviceIntrinsic sphincter deficiencyUrinary incontinenceWomen

Identifiers

PMID35751672
OpenAlexW4283466806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.