ReviewActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2022
Immune checkpoint blockades in gynecological cancers: A review of clinical trials.
Review in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comprehensive overview of antibody drug-related clinical studies in gynecology: insights from ClinicalTrials.gov.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical benefit analysis of PD-1 inhibitors in patients with advanced, recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Pooled it
- Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes: from prognosis to treatment selection.British journal of cancer · 2023Pooled it
- Prognostic impact of HLA-G expression in cervical squamous cell carcinoma: correlation with PD-L1 and CD8-positive tumor infiltrating lymphocytes.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Analysis of Immune Checkpoints on Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells Can Predict Clinical Outcome and Reveal Potential of HVEM-BTLA Axis in Epithelial Ovarian Cancers.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Ligand-Based CAR-T Cells Targeting EGFR Exhibit Favorable Antitumor Effects Against Gynecologic Malignancies.Cancer science · 2025Article
- Treatment strategies for advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer using immune checkpoint inhibitors.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Transcriptome profiling revealed multiple circadian rhythm-related genes associated with common gynecological cancers.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- NGR-modified nanovesicles target ALKBH5 to inhibit ovarian cancer growth and metastasis.Theranostics · 2025Article
- Immune checkpoint inhibitors in gynecological cancers: a narrative review on the practice-changing trials.Immunotherapy · 2025Review
- Regional immune mechanisms enhance efficacy of an autologous cellular cancer vaccine with intraperitoneal administration.Oncoimmunology · 2024Article
- Targeting TOP2A in Ovarian Cancer: Biological and Clinical Implications.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Review
- Pulsed electromagnetic fields inhibit IL-37 to alleviate CD8Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2024Article
- Article
- Review
- Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in melanoma: from prognostic assessment to therapeutic applications.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Recent breakthroughs in the management of locally advanced and recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2024Review
- Integrated bioinformatics combined with machine learning to analyze shared biomarkers and pathways in psoriasis and cervical squamous cell carcinoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Integrated machine learning identifies a cellular senescence-related prognostic model to improve outcomes in uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Role of the tumor microenvironment in the lymphatic metastasis of cervical cancer (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advanced and recurrent gynecological cancers are associated with a poor prognosis and there is still a lack of effective treatments. Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy is an important element of cancer-targeted therapy and immunotherapy. The programed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) pathways are the two main targets of ICB. In this study, we provide a comprehensive review of clinical evidence concerning ICB therapy in gynecological cancers and discuss future implications. All clinical trials of ICB therapy in gynecological cancers were reviewed. We searched ClinicalTrials.gov to collect data from completed and ongoing clinical trials. The clinical evidence regarding the efficacy of ICB agents in gynecological cancers were discussed. Six phase III clinical trials have reported their results of primary outcomes, and a total of 25 phase II clinical trials have been completed. As revealed in phase III trials, pembrolizumab (a PD-1 antibody) improved the overall survival and progression-free survival in endometrial cancer patients with mismatch repair deficiency and cervical cancer patients with expressions of PD-L1. Based on these findings, pembrolizumab was approved by the Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency as a cancer medication used to treat certain patients with endometrial cancer or cervical cancer. Other PD-1 antibodies, including dostarlimab and cemiplimab, also showed antitumor efficacy in clinical trials. Dostarlimab treatment showed an encouraging response rate in endometrial cancer patients with mismatch repair deficiency. Cemiplimab treatment led to a longer overall survival and a lower risk of death than chemotherapy among patients with recurrent cervical cancer. Three completed phase III trials investigated anti-PD-L1 agents (atezolizumab and avelumab) in the treatment of ovarian cancer. The results were not encouraging. Other strategies of ICB therapy which had showed potential clinical benefit in the treatment of gynecological cancers in early-phase trials need to be further evaluated in late-stage trials. The antitumor efficacy of ICB therapy is promising, and the key to making further progress in the treatment of gynecological cancers is to identify more biomarkers and explore innovative combination treatments with other targeted therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.