Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35751202›Full record

ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2022

Learning deep neural networks' architectures using differential evolution. Case study: Medical imaging processing.

Smaranda Belciug

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05738954 (Pattern Recognition and Anomaly Detection in Fetal Morphology Using Deep Learning and Statistical Learning), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05738954 unknown statusnot on this map

Pattern Recognition and Anomaly Detection in Fetal Morphology Using Deep Learning and Statistical Learning

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of CraiovaRan2022 to 2024Enrolled4,000ConditionsCongenital AbnormalitiesArmsUltrasound
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Smaranda BelciugDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Sciences, University of Craiova, Craiova, 200585, Romania. Electronic address: sbelciug@inf.ucv.ro.
University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has changed the way we practice medicine. Cancer patient and obstetric care landscapes have been distorted. Delaying cancer diagnosis or maternal-fetal monitoring increased the number of preventable deaths or pregnancy complications. One solution is using Artificial Intelligence to help the medical personnel establish the diagnosis in a faster and more accurate manner. Deep learning is the state-of-the-art solution for image classification. Researchers manually design the structure of fix deep learning neural networks structures and afterwards verify their performance. The goal of this paper is to propose a potential method for learning deep network architectures automatically. As the number of networks architectures increases exponentially with the number of convolutional layers in the network, we propose a differential evolution algorithm to traverse the search space. At first, we propose a way to encode the network structure as a candidate solution of fixed-length integer array, followed by the initialization of differential evolution method. A set of random individuals is generated, followed by mutation, recombination, and selection. At each generation the individuals with the poorest loss values are eliminated and replaced with more competitive individuals. The model has been tested on three cancer datasets containing MRI scans and histopathological images and two maternal-fetal screening ultrasound images. The novel proposed method has been compared and statistically benchmarked to four state-of-the-art deep learning networks: VGG16, ResNet50, Inception V3, and DenseNet169. The experimental results showed that the model is competitive to other state-of-the-art models, obtaining accuracies between 78.73% and 99.50% depending on the dataset it had been applied on.

Indexed as

COVID-19Deep LearningArtificial IntelligenceDiagnostic ImagingHumansNeural Networks, ComputerPandemicsCancer histopathological imageCancer MRI scanDeep learningDifferential evolutionMaternal-fetal ultrasoundStatistical assessment

Identifiers

PMID35751202
PMCPMC9112664
OpenAlexW4280536273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.