ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2022
An intelligent algorithm to evaluate and improve the performance of a home healthcare center considering trust indicators.
Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Performance assessment and improvement of a care unit for COVID-19 patients with resilience engineering and motivational factors: An artificial neural network method.Computers in biology and medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Home healthcare (HHC) is a beneficial choice for many people and especially an essential alternative to clinics and hospitals for infection prevention during the COVID-19 pandemic. Moreover, patient trust in HHC providers is critical to care success and highly affects patient satisfaction. In this paper, an intelligent algorithm is proposed to assess the performance of an HHC center considering trust indicators. For this purpose, the effect of these indicators on patient satisfaction was examined. First, the required data is collected from patients who received care from the HHC service under study through two validated questionnaires containing items related to trust and patient satisfaction. Efficiency scores for each decision-making unit were computed using an artificial neural network and statistical methods. Based on each trust indicator, sensitivity analysis and statistical tests were conducted to evaluate the (in) appropriateness of HHC center performance. In addition, a strengths-weaknesses-opportunities-threats analysis is conducted to suggest strategies for improving the HHC center performance. The algorithm was validated using the data envelopment analysis method. As far as we know, this is the first study to evaluate the performance of HHC centers based on trust indicators, and the model presented in this study can be implemented in other healthcare units to enhance patient satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.