Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35751014›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2022

Moment estimators of relatedness from low-depth whole-genome sequencing data.

Anthony F Herzig, M Ciullo, FranceGenRef Consortium, A-L Leutenegger, H Perdry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anthony F HerzigInserm, Univ Brest, EFS, UMR 1078, GGB, 29200, Brest, France. anthony.herzig@inserm.fr.
M CiulloInstitute of Genetics and Biophysics A. Buzzati-Traverso - CNR, Naples, Italy.
FranceGenRef Consortium
A-L LeuteneggerInserm, Université Paris Cité, UMR 1141, NeuroDiderot, 75019, Paris, France.
H PerdryCESP Inserm U1018, Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Villejuif, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEstimating relatedness is an important step for many genetic study designs. A variety of methods for estimating coefficients of pairwise relatedness from genotype data have been proposed. Both the kinship coefficient [Formula: see text] and the fraternity coefficient [Formula: see text] for all pairs of individuals are of interest. However, when dealing with low-depth sequencing or imputation data, individual level genotypes cannot be confidently called. To ignore such uncertainty is known to result in biased estimates. Accordingly, methods have recently been developed to estimate kinship from uncertain genotypes.

resultsWe present new method-of-moment estimators of both the coefficients [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] calculated directly from genotype likelihoods. We have simulated low-depth genetic data for a sample of individuals with extensive relatedness by using the complex pedigree of the known genetic isolates of Cilento in South Italy. Through this simulation, we explore the behaviour of our estimators, demonstrate their properties, and show advantages over alternative methods. A demonstration of our method is given for a sample of 150 French individuals with down-sampled sequencing data.

conclusionsWe find that our method can provide accurate relatedness estimates whilst holding advantages over existing methods in terms of robustness, independence from external software, and required computation time. The method presented in this paper is referred to as LowKi (Low-depth Kinship) and has been made available in an R package ( https://github.com/genostats/LowKi ).

Indexed as

Models, GeneticSoftwareComputer SimulationGenotypeHumansPedigreeWhole Genome SequencingFraternity coefficientGenotype likelihoodsKinshipLow-depthMoment estimatorsSequencing data

Identifiers

PMID35751014
PMCPMC9233360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.