Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35750996›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research communications2023

Different prenatal supplementation strategies and its impacts on reproductive and nutrigenetics assessments of bulls in finishing phase.

Guilherme Henrique Gebim Polizel, Rafael Espigolan, Paulo Fantinato-Neto, Ricardo de Francisco Strefezzi, Raissa Braido Rangel, Cynthia de Carli, Arícia Christofaro Fernandes, Evandro Fernando Ferreira Dias, Roberta Cavalcante Cracco, Miguel Henrique de Almeida Santana

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Guilherme Henrique Gebim PolizelDepartment of Animal Science, GOPec, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering, USP, Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga, SP, 13635-900, Brazil. guilhermepolizel875@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8497-9898
Rafael EspigolanDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering, USP, Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga, SP, 13635-900, Brazil.
Paulo Fantinato-NetoDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering, USP, Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga, SP, 13635-900, Brazil.
Ricardo de Francisco StrefezziDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering, USP, Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga, SP, 13635-900, Brazil.
Raissa Braido RangelDepartment of Animal Science, GOPec, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering, USP, Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga, SP, 13635-900, Brazil.
Cynthia de CarliDepartment of Animal Science, GOPec, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering, USP, Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga, SP, 13635-900, Brazil.
Arícia Christofaro FernandesDepartment of Animal Science, GOPec, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering, USP, Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga, SP, 13635-900, Brazil.
Evandro Fernando Ferreira DiasDepartment of Animal Science, GOPec, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering, USP, Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga, SP, 13635-900, Brazil.
Roberta Cavalcante CraccoDepartment of Animal Science, GOPec, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering, USP, Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga, SP, 13635-900, Brazil.
Miguel Henrique de Almeida SantanaDepartment of Animal Science, GOPec, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering, USP, Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225, Pirassununga, SP, 13635-900, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of different prenatal nutrition approaches in 126 pregnant Nellore cows on reproductive and nutrigenetic traits of the male offspring during the finishing phase. For that purpose, three nutritional treatments were used in these cows during pregnancy: PP - protein-energy supplementation in the final third, FP - protein-energy supplementation during the entire pregnancy, and NP - (control) only mineral supplementation. The male progeny (63 bulls; 665 ± 28 days of age) were evaluated for scrotal circumference, seminal traits, number of Sertoli cells and testicular area. We performed a genomic association (700 K SNPs) for scrotal circumference at this age. In addition, a functional enrichment was performed in search of significant metabolic pathways (P < 0.05) with inclusion of genes that are expressed in these genomic windows by the MetaCore software. With the exception of major sperm defects (P < 0.1), the other phenotypes showed no difference between prenatal treatments. We found genes and metabolic pathways (P < 0.05) that are associated with genomic windows (genetic variance explained >1%) in different treatments. These molecular findings indicate that there is genotype-environment interaction among the different prenatal treatments and that the FP treatment showed greater major sperm defects compared to the NP treatment.

Indexed as

NutrigenomicsSemenAnimalsCattleDietary SupplementsFemaleMalePolymorphism, Single NucleotidePregnancyReproductionBeef cattleDevelopmental programmingGWASMaternal nutritionReproductionSNPs

Identifiers

PMID35750996
OpenAlexW4283457252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.