Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35750980›Full record

ArticleJournal of community health2022

A Cross-Sectional Study of Untoward Reactions Following Homologous and Heterologous COVID-19 Booster Immunizations in Recipients Seventeen Years of Age and Older.

Manuela Tamburro, Giancarlo Ripabelli, Antonio D'Amico, Roberta De Dona, Mariagrazia Iafigliola, Albino Parente, Nicandro Samprati, Arturo Santagata, Carmen Adesso, Anna Natale and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Manuela TamburroDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences "Vincenzo Tiberio", University of Molise, Via De Sanctis, 86100, Campobasso, Italy.
Giancarlo RipabelliDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences "Vincenzo Tiberio", University of Molise, Via De Sanctis, 86100, Campobasso, Italy. ripab@unimol.it.ORCID 0000-0002-9953-7769
Antonio D'AmicoSchool of Specialization in Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy.
Roberta De DonaSchool of Specialization in Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy.
Mariagrazia IafigliolaSchool of Specialization in Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy.
Albino ParenteSchool of Specialization in Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy.
Nicandro SampratiSchool of Specialization in Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy.
Arturo SantagataSchool of Specialization in Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy.
Carmen AdessoSchool of Specialization in Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy.
Anna NataleSchool of Specialization in Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy.
Michela Anna Di PalmaSchool of Specialization in Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy.
Fabio CannizzaroSchool of Specialization in Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy.
Michela Lucia SammarcoDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences "Vincenzo Tiberio", University of Molise, Via De Sanctis, 86100, Campobasso, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A booster dose after primary COVID-19 vaccination series was considered crucial after the emergence of the B.1.617.2 (Delta) and B.1.1.529 (Omicron) variants. Active surveillance was used to investigate reporting of adverse events post-booster dose of either of the licensed mRNA Comirnaty (Pfizer/BioNTech) or Spikevax (Moderna) vaccines in adult (17 years and older) recipients in central Italy. Eligible participants were enrolled and interviewed via phone using a structured questionnaire. Primary outcomes related to the occurrence of adverse events post-booster were stratified by vaccine, and frequency of local/systemic, mild/moderate/severe events. Of a total of 622 participants interviewed, 554 (89.1%) reported at least one adverse event (88.2% and 92.9% after the Comirnaty or Spikevax vaccine, respectively): 63.4% were female, and 78.5% aged 17 to 64 years, regardless of vaccine. 87.7% and 68.2% of all recipients described at least one local or systemic reaction, respectively: 97.3, 38.6 and 4.7% reported mild, moderate, or severe events, respectively. The most frequent adverse reactions were pain, redness, or swelling at the injection site and fatigue, while malaise and fever significantly occurred after the Comirnaty, and vomiting after the Spikevax booster. Compared to the primary vaccination, lymphadenopathy was more common after the booster (p < 0.001), especially after Comirnaty vaccine. The study findings revealed no serious or unexpected adverse events, and are in agreement with data available on booster dose for both mRNA vaccines. The transient, mild to moderate, and common to very common side reactions reported should be used to reassure potential recipients of the lack of safety concerns.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansImmunization, SecondaryMaleRNA, MessengerSARS-CoV-2VaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesRNA, MessengerActive surveillanceAdverse reactionsComirnatyCOVID-19 booster vaccinationSafetySpikevax

Identifiers

PMID35750980
PMCPMC9244372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.