Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35750971›Full record

Observational studyCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2022

Enhancing knowledge, skills, and comfort in providing anesthesia assistance during obstetric general anesthesia for operating room nurses: a prospective observational study.

Robert Ffrench-O'Carroll, Zahid Sunderani, Roanne Preston, Ulrike Mayer, Arianne Albert, Anthony Chau

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Robert Ffrench-O'Carroll *Department of Anesthesia, BC Women's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Zahid Sunderani *Department of Anesthesia, Rockyview General Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Roanne PrestonDepartment of Anesthesia, BC Women's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Ulrike MayerWomen's Health Research Institute, BC Women's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Arianne AlbertWomen's Health Research Institute, BC Women's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Anthony ChauDepartment of Anesthesia, BC Women's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada. anton.chau@ubc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9484-2863
Women's Health Research Institute · CAB.C. Women's Hospital & Health Centre · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of British Columbia Hospital · CAUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to a nationwide shortage of anesthesia assistants, operating room nurses are often recruited to assist with the induction of obstetric general anesthesia (GA). We developed and administered a training program and hypothesized there would be significant improvements in knowledge and skills in anesthesia assistance during obstetric GA by operating room nurses following training with adequate retention at six months.

methodsFollowing informed consent, all operating room nurses at our institution were invited to participate in the study. Baseline knowledge of participants was assessed using a 14-item multiple choice questionnaire (MCQ), and skills were assessed using a 12-item checklist scored by direct observation during simulated induction of GA. Next, a 20-min didactic lecture followed by a ten-minute hands-on skills station were delivered. Knowledge and skills were immediately reassessed after training, and again at six weeks and six months. The primary outcomes of this study were adequate knowledge and skills retention at six months, defined as achieving ≥ 80% in MCQ and ≥ 80% in skills checklist scores and analyzed using longitudinal mixed-effects linear regression.

resultsA total of 34 nurses completed the study at six months. The mean MCQ score at baseline was 8.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.5 to 9.4) out of 14. The mean skills checklist score was 5.5 (95% CI, 4.9 to 6.1) out of 12. The mean comfort scores for assisting elective and emergency Cesarean deliveries were 3.6 (95% CI, 3.2 to 3.9) and 3.1 (95% CI, 2.7 to 3.5) out of 5, respectively. There was a significant difference in the mean MCQ and skills checklist scores across the different study periods (overall P value < 0.001). Post hoc pairwise tests suggested that, compared with baseline, there were significantly higher mean MCQ scores at all time points after the training program at six weeks (11.9; 95% CI, 11.4 to 12.4; P < 0.001) and at six months (12.0; 95% CI, 11.5 to 12.4; P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: The knowledge and skills of operating room nurses in providing anesthesia assistance during obstetric GA at our institution were low at baseline. Following a single 30-min in-house, anesthesiologist-led, structured training program, scores in both dimensions significantly improved. Although knowledge improvements were adequately retained for up to six months, skills improvements decayed rapidly, suggesting that sessions should be repeated at six-week intervals, at least initially.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, ObstetricalAnesthesiologyAnesthesia, GeneralClinical CompetenceFemaleHumansOperating RoomsPregnancygeneral anesthesiahuman factorsknowledge acquisitionobstetric anesthesiaskills retention

Identifiers

PMID35750971
OpenAlexW4283459238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.