ArticleArchives of microbiology2022
Variation in spatial organization of the gut microbiota along the longitudinal and transverse axes of the intestines.
Article in Archives of microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microbial engraftment and immune regulation during fecal microbiota transplantation and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.Nature communications · 2026Review
- Microbial transformation of secondary bile acids: roles in gut ecology and autoimmune diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Do we need a standardized 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing analysis protocol for poultry microbiota research?Poultry science · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Elucidation of the mechanisms by which the microbiota-gut-brain axis influences behavior requires understanding the anatomical relationship of bacteria with mucosal elements. We herein report that microbes were mainly associated with food or fecal matter in the intestinal lumen. In the small intestine, bacterial density increased from proximal-to-distal levels and was much higher in the large intestine. A mucus layer was present between the mucosal epithelium and fecal boluses in the large intestine, but not between food and the mucosal epithelium in the small intestine. In contrast, in all intestinal regions lacking food or fecal boluses, the lumen was small, or absent, and contained little or no bacteria or mucus. The association of bacteria with food was tested in the small intestine by examining the effect of fasting on it. Bacterial density was equivalent in the ileum of fasted and fed mice, but fasting greatly reduced the amount of food containing bacteria, suggesting the amount of bacteria was reduced. Critically, this study provides evidence that the vast majority of the microbiota in the intestines are associated with the food matrix thereby raising questions regarding how the gut microbiota can potentially signal the brain and influence behavior. Given their spatial location within the lumen, which keeps them at a great distance from neuronal elements in the mucosa, combined with immune and mucus barriers, microbiota more likely to influence behavior through secretion of bacterial products that can traverse the spatial difference to interact with gut neurons and not through direct physical association.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.