Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35750930›Full record

Observational studyNeurocritical care2022

Predicting Shunt Dependency from the Effect of Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage on Ventricular Size.

Clio Rubinos, Soon Bin Kwon, Murad Megjhani, Kalijah Terilli, Brenda Wong, Lizbeth Cespedes, Jenna Ford, Renz Reyes, Hannah Kirsch, Ayham Alkhachroum and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Neurocritical care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Clio Rubinos *Department of Neurology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Soon Bin Kwon *Department of Neurology, Columbia University, 177 Fort Washington Avenue, MHB 8 Center, Room 300, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Murad MegjhaniDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University, 177 Fort Washington Avenue, MHB 8 Center, Room 300, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Kalijah TerilliDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University, 177 Fort Washington Avenue, MHB 8 Center, Room 300, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Brenda WongNewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Lizbeth CespedesNewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Jenna FordDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University, 177 Fort Washington Avenue, MHB 8 Center, Room 300, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Renz ReyesNewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Hannah KirschDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University, 177 Fort Washington Avenue, MHB 8 Center, Room 300, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Ayham AlkhachroumDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University, 177 Fort Washington Avenue, MHB 8 Center, Room 300, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Angela VelazquezDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University, 177 Fort Washington Avenue, MHB 8 Center, Room 300, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
David RohDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University, 177 Fort Washington Avenue, MHB 8 Center, Room 300, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Sachin AgarwalDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University, 177 Fort Washington Avenue, MHB 8 Center, Room 300, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Jan ClaassenDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University, 177 Fort Washington Avenue, MHB 8 Center, Room 300, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
E Sander ConnollyNewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Soojin ParkDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University, 177 Fort Washington Avenue, MHB 8 Center, Room 300, New York, NY, 10032, USA. sp3291@cumc.columbia.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3688-7307
NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USColumbia University · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Machine Learning to Optimize Management of Acute Hydrocephalus PatientsR21NS113055 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI PARK, SOOJIN · 2020 to 2020
$446k
American Heart Association-American Stroke Association 20POST35210653NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS113055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProlonged external ventricular drainage (EVD) in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) leads to morbidity, whereas early removal can have untoward effects related to recurrent hydrocephalus. A metric to help determine the optimal time for EVD removal or ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement would be beneficial in preventing the prolonged, unnecessary use of EVD. This study aimed to identify whether dynamics of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biometrics can temporally predict VPS dependency after SAH.

methodsThis was a retrospective analysis of a prospective, single-center, observational study of patients with aneurysmal SAH who required EVD placement for hydrocephalus. Patients were divided into VPS-dependent (VPS+) and non-VPS dependent groups. We measured the bicaudate index (BCI) on all available computed tomography scans and calculated the change over time (ΔBCI). We analyzed the relationship of ΔBCI with CSF output by using Pearson's correlation. A k-nearest neighbor model of the relationship between ΔBCI and CSF output was computed to classify VPS.

resultsFifty-eight patients met inclusion criteria. CSF output was significantly higher in the VPS+ group in the 7 days post EVD placement. There was a negative correlation between delta BCI and CSF output in the VPS+ group (negative delta BCI means ventricles become smaller) and a positive correlation in the VPS- group starting from days four to six after EVD placement (p < 0.05). A weighted k-nearest neighbor model for classification had a sensitivity of 0.75, a specificity of 0.70, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.80.

conclusionsThe correlation of ΔBCI and CSF output is a reliable intraindividual biometric for VPS dependency after SAH as early as days four to six after EVD placement. Our machine learning model leverages this relationship between ΔBCI and cumulative CSF output to predict VPS dependency. Early knowledge of VPS dependency could be studied to reduce EVD duration in many centers (intensive care unit length of stay).

Indexed as

HydrocephalusSubarachnoid HemorrhageCerebrospinal Fluid LeakCerebrospinal Fluid ShuntsDrainageHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesVentriculoperitoneal ShuntCerebral spinal fluid dynamicsExternal ventricular drainHydrocephalusMachine learningShunt dependencySubarachnoid

Identifiers

PMID35750930
PMCPMC9847349
OpenAlexW4283451980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.