ArticleUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2023
[Antibiotic use for prophylaxis and empirical therapy of fracture-related infections in Germany : A survey of 44 hospitals].
Article in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antibiotic prophylaxis in trauma and orthopedic surgery : Current practices across 36 German hospitals and comparison with recently published national guidelines.Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- [Importance of local antibiotics in the prophylaxis and treatment of fracture-associated infections].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAntibiotics play an important role in the prophylaxis and treatment of infections in orthopedic trauma surgery; however, there seems to be remarkable differences in the clinical antibiotic practice between hospitals, particularly for open fractures and for the empirical therapy of fracture-related infections (FRI).
methodsTherefore, we intended to evaluate the current clinical praxis in university and workers' compensation hospitals in Germany with a questionnaire on prophylaxis and empirical treatment of FRI. The results were compared with the resistance profile of 86 FRI patients in order to analyze the hypothetical effectiveness of the empirical treatment.
resultsA total of 44 hospitals (62.0%) responded. A homogeneous antibiotic prophylaxis (95.5% of all hospitals) with cephalosporins was reported for perioperative prophylaxis of internal fixation of closed fractures. For open fractures, eight different monotherapy and combination treatment concepts were reported. In empirical treatment of FRI, 12 different therapeutic concepts were reported, including aminopenicillins/beta lactamase inhibitors (BLI) (31.8%), cephalosporins (31.8%), and ampicillin/sulbactam + vancomycin (9.1%). In terms of the hypothetical effectiveness of these antibiotic regimes, low sensitivity rates of 65.1% and 74.4% for cephalosporins and aminopenicillins/BLI, respectively, were found. For the combination vancomycin + meropenem, the highest hypothetical sensitivity (91.9%) was detected. DISCUSSION: Based on the existing, institution-specific pathogen spectrum, the combination therapy including meropenem and vancomycin seems to be of value but should be restricted to patients with multiple revision procedures or a septic course of infection in order to prevent the selection of highly resistant pathogens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.