Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35750792›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

A miniaturized 3D printed pressure regulator (µPR) for microfluidic cell culture applications.

Meng-Chun Hsu, Mehran Mansouri, Nuzhet N N Ahamed, Stephen M Larson, Indranil M Joshi, Adeel Ahmed, David A Borkholder, Vinay V Abhyankar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Microengineering 3D Collagen Hydrogels with Long-Range Fiber Alignment.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Meng-Chun HsuDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, 14623, USA.
Mehran MansouriDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, 14623, USA.
Nuzhet N N AhamedDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, 14623, USA.
Stephen M LarsonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, 14623, USA.
Indranil M JoshiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, 14623, USA.
Adeel AhmedDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, 14623, USA.
David A BorkholderDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, 14623, USA.
Vinay V AbhyankarDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, 14623, USA. vvabme@rit.edu.

Funding

Commercializing the µSIM: A Modular Platform for the Development and Analysis of Barrier Tissue ModelsR43GM137651 · NIGMS · SIMPORE, INC. · PI ROUSSIE, JAMES ANDREW · 2020 to 2020
$235k
NIH HHS 1R43GM137651
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Well-defined fluid flows are the hallmark feature of microfluidic culture systems and enable precise control over biophysical and biochemical cues at the cellular scale. Microfluidic flow control is generally achieved using displacement-based (e.g., syringe or peristaltic pumps) or pressure-controlled techniques that provide numerous perfusion options, including constant, ramped, and pulsed flows. However, it can be challenging to integrate these large form-factor devices and accompanying peripherals into incubators or other confined environments. In addition, microfluidic culture studies are primarily carried out under constant perfusion conditions and more complex flow capabilities are often unused. Thus, there is a need for a simplified flow control platform that provides standard perfusion capabilities and can be easily integrated into incubated environments. To this end, we introduce a tunable, 3D printed micro pressure regulator (µPR) and show that it can provide robust flow control capabilities when combined with a battery-powered miniature air pump to support microfluidic applications. We detail the design and fabrication of the µPR and: (i) demonstrate a tunable outlet pressure range relevant for microfluidic applications (1-10 kPa), (ii) highlight dynamic control capabilities in a microfluidic network, (iii) and maintain human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) in a multi-compartment culture device under continuous perfusion conditions. We anticipate that our 3D printed fabrication approach and open-access designs will enable customized µPRs that can support a broad range of microfluidic applications.

Indexed as

Cell Culture TechniquesMicrofluidicsHumansHuman Umbilical Vein Endothelial CellsPerfusionPrinting, Three-Dimensional

Identifiers

PMID35750792
PMCPMC9232624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.