Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35750764›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

The cell cycle stage of bovine zygotes electroporated with CRISPR/Cas9-RNP affects frequency of Loss-of-heterozygosity editing events.

Dennis Miskel, Mikhael Poirier, Luisa Beunink, Franca Rings, Eva Held, Ernst Tholen, Dawit Tesfaye, Karl Schellander, Dessie Salilew-Wondim, Carina Blaschka and 3 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Ablation ofPNAS nexus · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dennis MiskelInstitute of Animal Sciences, Animal Breeding, University of Bonn, Endenicher Allee 15, 53115, Bonn, Germany.
Mikhael PoirierInstitute of Animal Sciences, Animal Breeding, University of Bonn, Endenicher Allee 15, 53115, Bonn, Germany.
Luisa BeuninkInstitute of Animal Sciences, Animal Breeding, University of Bonn, Endenicher Allee 15, 53115, Bonn, Germany.
Franca RingsInstitute of Animal Sciences, Animal Breeding, University of Bonn, Endenicher Allee 15, 53115, Bonn, Germany.
Eva HeldInstitute of Animal Sciences, Animal Breeding, University of Bonn, Endenicher Allee 15, 53115, Bonn, Germany.
Ernst TholenInstitute of Animal Sciences, Animal Breeding, University of Bonn, Endenicher Allee 15, 53115, Bonn, Germany.
Dawit TesfayeDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology Laboratory, Colorado State University, 3105 Rampart Rd, Fort Collins, CO, 80521, USA.
Karl SchellanderInstitute of Animal Sciences, Animal Breeding, University of Bonn, Endenicher Allee 15, 53115, Bonn, Germany.
Dessie Salilew-WondimInstitute of Animal Sciences, Animal Breeding, University of Bonn, Endenicher Allee 15, 53115, Bonn, Germany.
Carina BlaschkaDepartment of Animal Science, Biotechnology and Reproduction of Farm Animals, Georg August University Goettingen, Burckhardtweg 2, 37077, Goettingen, Germany.
Christine Große-BrinkhausInstitute of Animal Sciences, Animal Breeding, University of Bonn, Endenicher Allee 15, 53115, Bonn, Germany.
Bertram BrenigDepartment of Molecular Biology of Livestock, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Georg August University Goettingen, Burckhardtweg 2, 37077, Goettingen, Germany.
Michael HoelkerDepartment of Animal Science, Biotechnology and Reproduction of Farm Animals, Georg August University Goettingen, Burckhardtweg 2, 37077, Goettingen, Germany. michael.hoelker@uni-goettingen.de.
University of Bonn · DEUniversity of Göttingen · DEColorado State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At the embryonic level, CRISPR technologies have been used to edit genomes reliably and efficiently in various mammalian models, with Ribonucleoprotein (RNP) electroporation potentially representing a superior delivery method into mammalian zygotes. However, detailed insights of the interactions between varying technical settings as well as the time point of electroporation in a bovine zygote's cell cycle on developmental metrics and the frequency and type of editing events are largely unknown. The present study uncovers that increasing pulse lengths result in higher Full Edit rates, with Mosaicism in Full-Edit embryos being significantly affected by adjusting RNP-electroporation relative to zygote cell cycle. A considerable proportion of Full Edit embryos demonstrated loss-of-heterozygosity after RNP-electroporation prior to S-phase. Some of these loss-of-heterozygosity events are a consequence of chromosomal disruptions along large sections of the target chromosomes making it necessary to check for their presence prior use of this technique in animal breeding. One out of 2 of these loss-of-heterozygosity events, however, was not associated with loss of an entire chromosome or chromosomal sections. Whether analysed loss-of-heterozygosity in these cases, however, was a false negative result due to loss of PCR primer sequences after INDEL formation at the target side or indeed due to interhomolog recombination needs to be clarified in follow up studies since the latter would for sure offer attractive options for future breeding schedules.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Associated Protein 9ZygoteAnimalsCattleCell DivisionCRISPR-Cas SystemsElectroporationGene EditingMammalsRibonucleoproteinsCRISPR-Associated Protein 9Ribonucleoproteins

Identifiers

PMID35750764
PMCPMC9232522
OpenAlexW4283452105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.