Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35750759›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Nanopore sequencing of a monkeypox virus strain isolated from a pustular lesion in the Central African Republic.

Mathias Vandenbogaert, Aurélia Kwasiborski, Ella Gonofio, Stéphane Descorps-Declère, Benjamin Selekon, Andriniaina Andy Nkili Meyong, Rita Sem Ouilibona, Antoine Gessain, Jean-Claude Manuguerra, Valérie Caro and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Fusarium Genome Sequencing and Assembly.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Biological Characteristics and Pathogenesis of Monkeypox Virus: An Overview.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  10. Real-time genomics for One Health.Molecular systems biology · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Mathias Vandenbogaert *Unité Environnement et Risque Infectieux, Cellule d'Intervention Biologique d'Urgence, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.
Aurélia Kwasiborski *Unité Environnement et Risque Infectieux, Cellule d'Intervention Biologique d'Urgence, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.
Ella Gonofio *Institut Pasteur de Bangui, Bangui, Central African Republic.
Stéphane Descorps-DeclèreCentre of Bioinformatics, Biostatistics and Integrative Biology (C3BI), Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.
Benjamin SelekonInstitut Pasteur de Bangui, Bangui, Central African Republic.
Andriniaina Andy Nkili MeyongCentre Interdisciplinaire de Recherches Médicales de Franceville (CIRMF), Franceville, Gabon.
Rita Sem OuilibonaInstitut Pasteur de Bangui, Bangui, Central African Republic.
Antoine GessainUnité d'Epidémiologie et Physiopathologie des Virus Oncogènes, Département de Virologie, UMR3569, Institut Pasteur, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS, Paris, France.
Jean-Claude ManuguerraUnité Environnement et Risque Infectieux, Cellule d'Intervention Biologique d'Urgence, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.
Valérie CaroUnité Environnement et Risque Infectieux, Cellule d'Intervention Biologique d'Urgence, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.
Emmanuel NakouneInstitut Pasteur de Bangui, Bangui, Central African Republic.
Nicolas BerthetUnité Environnement et Risque Infectieux, Cellule d'Intervention Biologique d'Urgence, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France. nicolas.berthet@pasteur.fr.
Institut Pasteur · FRInstitut Pasteur de Bangui · CFCentre International de Recherches Médicales de Franceville · GACentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRChinese Academy of Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monkeypox is an emerging and neglected zoonotic disease whose number of reported cases has been gradually increasing in Central Africa since 1980. This disease is caused by the monkeypox virus (MPXV), which belongs to the genus Orthopoxvirus in the family Poxviridae. Obtaining molecular data is particularly useful for establishing the relationships between the viral strains involved in outbreaks in countries affected by this disease. In this study, we evaluated the use of the MinION real-time sequencer as well as different polishing tools on MinION-sequenced genome for sequencing the MPXV genome originating from a pustular lesion in the context of an epidemic in a remote area of the Central African Republic. The reads corresponding to the MPXV genome were identified using two taxonomic classifiers, Kraken2 and Kaiju. Assembly of these reads led to a complete sequence of 196,956 bases, which is 6322 bases longer than the sequence previously obtained with Illumina sequencing from the same sample. The comparison of the two sequences showed mainly indels at the homopolymeric regions. However, the combined use of Canu with specific polishing tools such as Medaka and Homopolish was the best combination that reduced their numbers without adding mismatches. Although MinION sequencing is known to introduce a number of characteristic errors compared to Illumina sequencing, the new polishing tools allow a better-quality MinION-sequenced genome, thus to be used to help determine strain origin through phylogenetic analysis.

Indexed as

Mpox, MonkeypoxNanopore SequencingCentral African RepublicHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMonkeypox virusPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID35750759
PMCPMC9232561
OpenAlexW4283397960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.