ArticleScientific reports2022
Random walk diffusion simulations in semi-permeable layered media with varying diffusivity.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Realistic numerical simulations of diffusion tensor cardiovascular magnetic resonance: The effects of perfusion and membrane permeability.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
- Cardiac q-space trajectory imaging by motion-compensated tensor-valued diffusion encoding in human heart in vivo.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this paper we present random walk based solutions to diffusion in semi-permeable layered media with varying diffusivity. We propose a novel transit model for solving the interaction of random walkers with a membrane. This hybrid model is based on treating the membrane permeability and the step change in diffusion coefficient as two interactions separated by an infinitesimally small layer. By conducting an extensive analytical flux analysis, the performance of our hybrid model is compared with a commonly used membrane transit model (reference model). Numerical simulations demonstrate the limitations of the reference model in dealing with step changes in diffusivity and show the capability of the hybrid model to overcome this limitation and to offer substantial gains in computational efficiency. The suitability of both random walk transit models for the application to simulations of diffusion tensor cardiovascular magnetic resonance (DT-CMR) imaging is assessed in a histology-based domain relevant to DT-CMR. In order to demonstrate the usefulness of the new hybrid model for other possible applications, we also consider a larger range of permeabilities beyond those commonly found in biological tissues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.