ArticleDental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials2022
The threshold of an intra oral scanner to measure lesion depth on natural unpolished teeth.
Article in Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Defining progression in erosive tooth wear: an interpretive challenge.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Pooled it
- The subsurface lesion in erosive tooth wear.Journal of dentistry · 2023Trial
- Damage of irradiated teeth by ultrasonic scaling: an in vitro study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- A validation of 3D imaging for non-invasive, tech-assisted diagnosis of caries and erosive tooth wear in primary teeth - an in vitro study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Tribology of dental materials: from laboratory metrics to clinical durability: review and translational roadmap.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Review
- Zirconium particles in toothpaste: a novel approach to whitening and its impact on enamel wear.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Recent Advances in Intraoral Scanners.Journal of dental research · 2024Review
- Effect of the Abutment Rigidity on the Wear Resistance of a Lithium Disilicate Glass Ceramic: An In Vitro Study.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
- Diagnostic Applications of Intraoral Scanners: A Systematic Review.Journal of imaging · 2023Review
- Contemporary Role and Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry.F1000Research · 2023Review
- On the use of dental microwear texture analysis to determine etiology and assess wear of dental tissues for clinical evaluation.Biosurface and biotribologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate the threshold and accuracy of intraoral scanning in measuring freeform human enamel surfaces.
methodsSoftware softgauges, ranging between 20 and 160 µm depth, were used to compare four workflow analysis techniques to measure step height on a freeform surface; with or without reference areas and in combination with surface-subtraction to establish which combination produced the most accurate outcome. Having established the optimum combination, 1.5 mm diameter, individual depths ranging from 11 to 81 µm were created separately on 14 unpolished human enamel samples and then scanned with gold standard laboratory optical profilometry (NCLP, TaiCaan Technologies™, XYRIS2000CL, UK) and a clinical intraoral scanner (TrueDefinition™, Midmark Corp., USA). The sequence of surface registration and subtraction determined from the softgauges was used to measure step height on natural human enamel surfaces. Step heights (μm) were compared using two-way ANOVA with post-hoc Bonferroni (p < 0.05) and Bland-Altman analyses.
resultsSoftware differences were significantly reduced from - 29.7 to - 32.5% without, to - 2.4 to - 3.6% with reference areas (p < 0.0001) and the addition of surface-subtraction after registration reduced this further to 0.0 to - 0.3% (p < 0.0001). The intraoral scanner had a depth discrimination threshold of 73 µm on unpolished natural enamel and significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed compared to NCLP below this level. SIGNIFICANCE: The workflow of combining surface-registration and subtraction of surface profiles taken from intraoral scans of freeform unpolished enamel enabled confident measurement of step height above 73 µm. The limits of the scanner is related to data capture and these results provide opportunities for clinical measurement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.