Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35750462›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2022

Point-of-care lung ultrasonography for early identification of mild COVID-19: a prospective cohort of outpatients in a Swiss screening center.

Siméon Schaad, Thomas Brahier, Mary-Anne Hartley, Jean-Baptiste Cordonnier, Luca Bosso, Tanguy Espejo, Olivier Pantet, Olivier Hugli, Pierre-Nicolas Carron, Jean-Yves Meuwly and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Post‑COVID‑19 Syndrome in Outpatients: a Cohort Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Siméon Schaad *Infectious Diseases Service, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland simeon.schaad@unil.ch.ORCID 0000-0003-3110-071X
Thomas Brahier *Infectious Diseases Service, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Mary-Anne HartleyDigital global Health Department, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jean-Baptiste CordonnierMachine Learning and Optimization Laboratory, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Luca BossoEmergency Department, Lausanne University Hospital Emergency Care Service, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Tanguy EspejoEmergency Department, Lausanne University Hospital Emergency Care Service, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Olivier PantetAdult Intensive Care Unit, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Olivier HugliEmergency Department, Lausanne University Hospital Emergency Care Service, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2312-1625
Pierre-Nicolas CarronEmergency Department, Lausanne University Hospital Emergency Care Service, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jean-Yves MeuwlyDepartment of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital Division of Radio-diagnostics and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Noémie Boillat-Blanco *Infectious Diseases Service, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
University of Lausanne · CHUniversity Hospital of Lausanne · CHÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesEarly identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection is important to guide quarantine and reduce transmission. This study evaluates the diagnostic performance of lung ultrasound (LUS), an affordable, consumable-free point-of-care tool, for COVID-19 screening. DESIGN, SETTING AND

participantsThis prospective observational cohort included adults presenting with cough and/or dyspnoea at a SARS-CoV-2 screening centre of Lausanne University Hospital between 31 March and 8 May 2020.

interventionsInvestigators recorded standardised LUS images and videos in 10 lung zones per patient. Two blinded independent experts reviewed LUS recording and classified abnormal findings according to prespecified criteria to investigate their predictive value to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection according to PCR on nasopharyngeal swabs (COVID-19 positive vs COVID-19 negative). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: We finally combined LUS and clinical findings to derive a multivariate logistic regression diagnostic score.

resultsOf 134 included patients, 23% (n=30/134) were COVID-19 positive and 77% (n=103/134) were COVID-19 negative; 85%, (n=114/134) cases were previously healthy healthcare workers presenting within 2-5 days of symptom onset (IQR). Abnormal LUS findings were significantly more frequent in COVID-19 positive compared with COVID-19 negative (45% vs 26%, p=0.045) and mostly consisted of focal pathologic B lines. Combining clinical findings in a multivariate logistic regression score had an area under the receiver operating curve of 80.3% to detect COVID-19, and slightly improved to 84.5% with the addition of LUS features.

conclusionsCOVID-19-positive patients are significantly more likely to have lung pathology by LUS. However, LUS has an insufficient sensitivity and is not an appropriate screening tool in outpatients. LUS only adds little value to clinical features alone.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdultHumansLungOutpatientsPoint-of-Care SystemsProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2SwitzerlandUltrasonographyCOVID-19diagnostic radiologyinfectious diseasesultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID35750462
PMCPMC9234434
OpenAlexW4283387328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.