ArticleBMJ case reports2022
Carcinoid ovary with synchronous carcinoid tumour of the appendix: report of a rare occurrence with review of literature.
Article in BMJ case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Case Report: Strumal carcinoid tumor in the ovary: report of a rare occurrence with a review of literature.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Strumal Carcinoid Tumor of the Ovary: Report of Rare Occurrence with Review of Literature.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Carcinoid tumours are present in a wide range of organs but most frequently involve the gastrointestinal tract and rarely reported in gynaecological organs. Literature reports that the prevalence of ovarian carcinoid is 0.3%-1% of ovarian neoplasms and accounts for only 5% of ovarian teratomas. The pathogenesis of neuroendocrine tumours associated with synchronous primaries is undetermined and many theories have been proposed, such as existence of a common carcinogenic effect or a common stem cell undergoing similar genetic mutation. Paracrine or autocrine growth loop effect by the secretory peptides of the neuroendocrine cell tumours is also suggested. Since carcinoids are variably positive in neuroendocrine and organ-specific markers, there are no immunohistochemistry markers to delineate the definite primary site of origin versus metastasis. We report a rare case of carcinoid ovary with synchronous carcinoid tumour of the appendix. In our case, the presence of contralateral teratomatous elements may hint primary struma carcinoid instead of being metastatic from the appendix. A strumal carcinoid component was also highlighted by PAX8 positivity. This led us to conclude the case as concurrent appendix carcinoid with struma carcinoid as two independent primaries with uncertain pathogenesis. Histologically, as both tumours are well differentiated with Ki-67 of less than 3%, the decision of the joint tumour board was to keep the patient on surveillance, with no adjuvant treatment needed. The patient is currently on surveillance and the follow-up period of 24 months to date has been uneventful.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.