Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35749675›Full record

ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2022

Applying Artificial Neural Networks to Develop a Decision Support Tool for Tis-4N0M0 Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy.

Takafumi Nemoto, Atsuya Takeda, Yukinori Matsuo, Noriko Kishi, Takahisa Eriguchi, Etsuo Kunieda, Ryusei Kimura, Naoko Sanuki, Yuichiro Tsurugai, Masamichi Yagi and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Takafumi NemotoRadiation Oncology Center, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5370-0970
Atsuya TakedaRadiation Oncology Center, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2820-0760
Yukinori MatsuoDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Noriko KishiDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5007-8808
Takahisa EriguchiRadiation Oncology Center, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan.
Etsuo KuniedaRadiation Oncology Center, Tokyo General Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9638-1789
Ryusei KimuraBiostatistics Unit, Clinical and Translational Research Center, Keio University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Naoko SanukiRadiation Oncology Center, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0274-9771
Yuichiro TsurugaiRadiation Oncology Center, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0872-2000
Masamichi YagiFujitsu Limited, Tokyo, Japan.
Yousuke AokiRadiation Oncology Center, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yohei OkuRadiation Oncology Center, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yuto KimuraRadiation Oncology Center, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan.
Changhee HanDepartment of Health Sciences, Saitama Prefectural University, Saitama, Japan.
Naoyuki ShigematsuDepartment of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeClear evidence indicating whether surgery or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is best for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is lacking. SBRT has many advantages. We used artificial neural networks (NNs) to predict treatment outcomes for patients with NSCLC receiving SBRT, aiming to aid in decision making. PATIENTS AND

methodsAmong consecutive patients receiving SBRT between 2005 and 2019 in our institution, we retrospectively identified those with Tis-T4N0M0 NSCLC. We constructed two NNs for prediction of overall survival (OS) and cancer progression in the first 5 years after SBRT, which were tested using an internal and an external test data set. We performed risk group stratification, wherein 5-year OS and cancer progression were stratified into three groups.

resultsIn total, 692 patients in our institution and 100 patients randomly chosen in the external institution were enrolled. The NNs resulted in concordance indexes for OS of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.73 to 0.79), 0.68 (95% CI, 0.60 to 0.75), and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.61 to 0.76) and area under the curve for cancer progression of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.75 to 0.84), 0.72 (95% CI, 0.60 to 0.83), and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.57 to 0.81) in the training, internal test, and external test data sets, respectively. The survival and cumulative incidence curves were significantly stratified. NNs selected low-risk cancer progression groups of 5.6%, 6.9%, and 7.0% in the training, internal test, and external test data sets, respectively, suggesting that 48% of patients with peripheral Tis-4N0M0 NSCLC can be at low-risk for cancer progression.

conclusionPredictions of SBRT outcomes using NNs were useful for Tis-4N0M0 NSCLC. Our results are anticipated to open new avenues for NN predictions and provide decision-making guidance for patients and physicians.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsRadiosurgeryHumansNeoplasm StagingNeural Networks, ComputerRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35749675
PMCPMC9259118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.