Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35749539›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Time to death from cervical cancer and predictors among cervical cancer patients in Felege Hiwot Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, North West Ethiopia: Facility-based retrospective follow-up study.

Andamlak Eskale Mebratie, Nurilign Abebe Moges, Belsity Temesgen Meselu, Misganaw Fikrie Melesse

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Medicaid expansion and overall mortality among women with cervical cancer.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andamlak Eskale MebratieDepartment of Epidemiology, Sidama Region Health Bureau, Awassa, Ethiopia.
Nurilign Abebe MogesDepartment of Public Health, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos, Ethiopia.
Belsity Temesgen MeseluDepartment of Midwifery, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos, Ethiopia.
Misganaw Fikrie MelesseDepartment of Midwifery, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-6343-7651
Debre Markos University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA sexually transmitted virus called the Human Papillomavirus is responsible for more than 99% of cervical cancer cases and its precursors. In 2019, the median survival time of cervical cancer patients at 5 years was 37 months. The survival time and predictors of death from cervical cancer vary in different study settings. This study was aimed to assess the time to death and to identify the major predictors of death of cervical cancer patients in Felege Hiwot Comprehensive Specialized Hospital.

methodsA facility-based retrospective follow-up study was conducted among 422 randomly selected cervical cancer patients in Felege Hiwot Comprehensive Specialized Hospital from 25th June 2017 to 31st March 2021. Data were extracted from the sampled patient charts by using a structured checklist which was prepared in an English version. Data were coded and then entered, edited, and cleaned using EPI-data 3.1 and exported to STATA14.2 statistical software for analysis. Frequencies and proportions were used to describe the study population with relevant variables and were presented using tables, pie charts, and graphs. Kaplan Meier and life table were used to describe the restricted mean survival time and the overall survival rates. Differences in survival among different variables were compared using the log-rank test. The assumption of proportional hazard was checked using Schoenfeld residual test. Variables having a P-value > 0.05 were considered as fulfilling the assumption. Variables with a significance level below 0.2 in the bivariable Cox regression model were included in a multivariable Cox regression model analysis, where Variables with a p-value < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant at a 95% confidence interval. Model fitness was checked by Cox-Snell residual.

resultsThe mean follow up time of this cohort was 27.66 (CI: 26.96, 28.36) months, and the restricted mean survival time of cervical cancer patients in this study was 40.21 (95% CI: 38.95, 41.47) months. Being FIGO stage IV [AHR = 6.10, 95% CI: 2.18, 16.90)], having adenocarcinoma [AHR = 3.12, 95% CI: 1.34, 7.28)], having co-morbidity [AHR = 2.57, 95% CI: 1.29, 5.11)], and being initiated with radiotherapy [AHR = 4.57, 95% CI: 1.60, 13.06)] were a significant predictors of death from cervical cancer.

conclusionThe restricted mean survival time of cervical cancer patients in this study was 40.21 months. Marital status, type of tumor histology, stage of disease, type of treatment initiated, and presence of co-morbidity were significant predictors of death for cervical cancer. Treatment of comorbidities in the early stage of cervical cancer plays a key role in maximizing the survival time of cervical cancer patients.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsEthiopiaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHospitals, SpecialHumansRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35749539
PMCPMC9232151
OpenAlexW4283466350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.