Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35749491›Full record

ArticleScience advances2022

Disentangling the evolutionary drivers of social complexity: A comprehensive test of hypotheses.

Peter Turchin, Harvey Whitehouse, Sergey Gavrilets, Daniel Hoyer, Pieter François, James S Bennett, Kevin C Feeney, Peter Peregrine, Gary Feinman, Andrey Korotayev and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Multifaceted ceramic analysis in the study of political expansion: Insights from the Zhou expansion in Shandong, China.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Bridging theory and data: A computational workflow for cultural evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Spread of the cycles: a feedback perspective on the Anthropocene.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  12. Characteristic processes of human evolution caused the Anthropocene and may obstruct its global solutions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  13. Playing the political game: the coevolution of institutions with group size and political inequality.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Tempo and Mode in Cultural Macroevolution.Evolutionary psychology : an international journal of evolutionary approaches to psychology and behavior · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Peter TurchinComplexity Science Hub Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-1292-8100
Harvey WhitehouseCentre for the Study of Social Cohesion, School of Anthropology and Museum Ethnography, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6935-6724
Sergey GavriletsDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Department of Mathematics, Center for the Dynamics of Social Complexity, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Daniel HoyerSeshat: Global History Databank, Evolution Institute, San Antonio, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2675-257X
Pieter FrançoisCentre for the Study of Social Cohesion, School of Anthropology and Museum Ethnography, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
James S BennettUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3051-1672
Kevin C FeeneyTerminusDB, Dublin, Ireland.
Peter PeregrineLawrence University, Appleton, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9185-3348
Gary FeinmanField Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4787-2733
Andrey KorotayevNational Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3014-2037
Nikolay KradinInstitute of History, Archaeology and Ethnology, Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-1024-6285
Jill LevineEvolution Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Jenny ReddishComplexity Science Hub Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-5553-6916
Enrico CioniSeshat: Global History Databank, Evolution Institute, San Antonio, FL, USA.
Romain WacziargUniversity of California Los Angeles, Anderson School of Management, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2394-7593
Gavin Mendel-GleasonTerminusDB, Dublin, Ireland.
Majid BenamComplexity Science Hub Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the Holocene, the scale and complexity of human societies increased markedly. Generations of scholars have proposed different theories explaining this expansion, which range from broadly functionalist explanations, focusing on the provision of public goods, to conflict theories, emphasizing the role of class struggle or warfare. To quantitatively test these theories, we develop a general dynamical model based on the theoretical framework of cultural macroevolution. Using this model and Seshat: Global History Databank, we test 17 potential predictor variables proxying mechanisms suggested by major theories of sociopolitical complexity (and >100,000 combinations of these predictors). The best-supported model indicates a strong causal role played by a combination of increasing agricultural productivity and invention/adoption of military technologies (most notably, iron weapons and cavalry in the first millennium BCE).

Identifiers

PMID35749491
PMCPMC9232109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.