Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35749482›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Personalised pose estimation from single-plane moving fluoroscope images using deep convolutional neural networks.

Florian Vogl, Pascal Schütz, Barbara Postolka, Renate List, William Taylor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Florian VoglInstitute for Biomechanics, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6322-4990
Pascal SchützInstitute for Biomechanics, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Barbara PostolkaInstitute for Biomechanics, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Renate ListInstitute for Biomechanics, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3292-1915
William TaylorInstitute for Biomechanics, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4060-4098

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measuring joint kinematics is a key requirement for a plethora of biomechanical research and applications. While x-ray based systems avoid the soft-tissue artefacts arising in skin-based measurement systems, extracting the object's pose (translation and rotation) from the x-ray images is a time-consuming and expensive task. Based on about 106'000 annotated images of knee implants, collected over the last decade with our moving fluoroscope during activities of daily living, we trained a deep-learning model to automatically estimate the 6D poses for the femoral and tibial implant components. By pretraining a single stage of our architecture using renderings of the implant geometries, our approach offers personalised predictions of the implant poses, even for unseen subjects. Our approach predicted the pose of both implant components better than about 0.75 mm (in-plane translation), 25 mm (out-of-plane translation), and 2° (all Euler-angle rotations) over 50% of the test samples. When evaluating over 90% of test samples, which included heavy occlusions and low contrast images, translation performance was better than 1.5 mm (in-plane) and 30 mm (out-of-plane), while rotations were predicted better than 3-4°. Importantly, this approach now allows for pose estimation in a fully automated manner.

Indexed as

Knee JointKnee ProsthesisActivities of Daily LivingBiomechanical PhenomenaFluoroscopyHumansNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID35749482
PMCPMC9231734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.