Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35749415›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2022

Prognostic value of sarcopenia in patients with rectal cancer: A meta-analysis.

Yueli Zhu, Xiaoming Guo, Qin Zhang, Yunmei Yang

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Sarcopenia in Colorectal Cancer Surgery-Minimally Invasive vs. Open.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yueli ZhuDepartment of Geriatrics, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Xiaoming GuoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China.
Qin ZhangDepartment of Geriatrics, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Yunmei YangDepartment of Geriatrics, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6646-4954
Zhejiang University · CNTongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSarcopenia is usually characterized by the loss of skeletal muscle mass and impaired muscle function which is commonly seen in the elderly. It has been found to be associated with poorer prognoses in many types of cancer. Computed tomography (CT) scan is frequently used to assess skeletal muscle mass and further calculate skeletal muscle index (SMI) at the third lumbar vertebra level (L3), which is used to define sarcopenia. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess the prognostic value of sarcopenia for overall survival (OS) in patients with rectal cancer.

methodsWe performed a systematic search to find relevant studies published up to 14 January 2021 in PubMed, Embase, Web of science and Scopus. In our meta-analysis, studies comparing OS in rectal cancer patients with sarcopenia versus those without were included. Quality assessment for included studies was evaluated according to the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. We directly extracted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in both univariate and multivariate analyses from each study. The Cochrane Collaboration's Review Manager 5.4 software was applied to analyze data. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines and website GRADEpro.

resultsFinally, a total of 7 studies involving 2377 patients were included. The pooled HRs were 2.10 (95% CI 1.33-3.32, P = 0.001) and 2.37 (95% CI 1.13-4.98, P = 0.02) using random-effects models in univariate and multivariate analyses, respectively. The results showed a significant association between sarcopenia and OS in patients with rectal cancer. The quality of the evidence for OS was moderate for both univariate and multivariate analyses.

conclusionCT-defined sarcopenia is an independent predictor for worse OS in patients with rectal cancer. Future studies with a more stringent definition of sarcopenia are required to further confirm our findings.

Indexed as

Rectal NeoplasmsSarcopeniaAgedHumansMuscle, SkeletalPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID35749415
PMCPMC9231737
OpenAlexW4283446846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.