Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35749404›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Subtype-specific expression of MELK is partly due to copy number alterations in breast cancer.

Ashley A Hardeman, Yoo Jane Han, Tatyana A Grushko, Jeffrey Mueller, Maria J Gomez, Yonglan Zheng, Olufunmilayo I Olopade

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ashley A HardemanDepartment of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Yoo Jane HanDepartment of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7465-2680
Tatyana A GrushkoDepartment of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Jeffrey MuellerDepartment of Pathology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Maria J GomezDepartment of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Yonglan ZhengDepartment of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Olufunmilayo I OlopadeDepartment of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
University of Chicago · US

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: CLINICAL TRIALSUL1RR024999 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI SOLWAY, JULIAN · 2007 to 2011
$25.3M
Developing an Oncology Workforce for the 21st Century - Renewal 01K12CA139160 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI OLOPADE, OLUFUNMILAYO F., SMITH, SONALI · 2010 to 2024
$10.6M
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA139160NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maternal embryonic leucine-zipper kinase (MELK) regulates cell cycle progression and is highly expressed in many cancers. The molecular mechanism of MELK dysregulation has not been determined in aggressive forms of breast cancer, such as triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). To evaluate molecular markers of MELK aberrations in aggressive breast cancer, we assessed MELK gene amplification and expression in breast tumors. MELK mRNA expression is highly up-regulated in basal-like breast cancer (BLBC), the major molecular subtype of TNBC, compared to luminal or other subtypes of breast tumors. MELK copy number (CN) gains are significantly associated with BLBC, whereas no significant association of CpG site methylation or histone modifications with breast cancer subtypes was observed. Accordingly, the CN gains appear to contribute to an increase in MELK expression, with a significant correlation between mRNA expression and CN in breast tumors and cell lines. Furthermore, immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays revealed that both nuclear and cytoplasmic staining scores of MELK were significantly higher in invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) tumors compared to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and normal breast tissues. Our data showed that upregulation of MELK in BLBC may be in part driven by CN gains, rather than epigenetic modifications, indicating a potential for overexpression and CN gains of MELK to be developed as a diagnostic and prognostic marker to identify patients who have more aggressive breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsDNA Copy Number VariationsFemaleHumansProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesRNA, MessengerMELK protein, humanProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID35749404
PMCPMC9231703
OpenAlexW4283382063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.