ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2023
C-reactive protein "at first sight": Standard postoperative trend in gynecological surgery and a comparative analysis with white blood cell levels.
Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perioperative inflammation in gynecologic oncology: nursing strategies for enhanced recovery and complication prevention.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Von Willebrand Factor Antigen, Biomarkers of Inflammation, and Microvascular Flap Thrombosis in Reconstructive Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- C-reactive protein "at first sight": Standard postoperative trend in gynecological surgery and a comparative analysis with white blood cell levels.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThere is a lack of information about the normal trend of C-reactive protein (CRP) blood levels in the postoperative days after gynecological benign surgery. We investigated the impact of different surgical techniques on CRP trend. We performed a comparative analysis between a CRP and white blood cell (WBC) trend in postoperative monitoring.
methodsWe studied 207 surgical patients for benign gynecological pathology. We analyzed CRP and WBC levels after surgery in the total number of women and separately by approaches.
resultsCRP mean log scores showed a typical behavior. Moreover, results from chi-square test underline that the proportion of women with this result is independent from the type of surgery they underwent. Log score mean values of CPR differed between all groups and between times. No difference in the mean number of white cells between the second and the third day was found, as observed for CRP.
conclusionsOur study shows a trend reference model in postoperative monitoring of patients with benign gynecological surgery. The comparative analysis between the CRP and WBC trend in the postoperative days provided us data demonstrating the superiority of CRP in postsurgical patient outcomes monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.