Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35749041›Full record

ArticleInvestigational new drugs2022

Efficacy and safety of amrubicin monotherapy after atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide in patients with relapsed small-cell lung cancer.

Hisao Imai, Yoshiaki Nagai, Hiroyuki Minemura, Takeshi Tsuda, Yutaka Yamada, Satoshi Wasamoto, Takayuki Kishikawa, Ayako Shiono, Jun Shiihara, Ou Yamaguchi and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigational new drugs, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Hisao ImaiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center, International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama, 350-1298, Japan. m06701014@gunma-u.ac.jp.
Yoshiaki NagaiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Saitama, Japan.
Hiroyuki MinemuraDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Takeshi TsudaDivision of Respiratory Medicine, Toyama Prefectural Central Hospital, Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Yutaka YamadaDivision of Respiratory Medicine, Ibaraki Prefectural Central Hospital, Kasama, Ibaraki, Japan.
Satoshi WasamotoDivision of Respiratory Medicine, Saku Central Hospital Advanced Care Center, Saku, Nagano, Japan.
Takayuki KishikawaDivision of Thoracic Oncology, Tochigi Cancer Center, Utsunomiya, Tochigi, Japan.
Ayako ShionoDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center, International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama, 350-1298, Japan.
Jun ShiiharaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Saitama, Japan.
Ou YamaguchiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center, International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama, 350-1298, Japan.
Atsuto MouriDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center, International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama, 350-1298, Japan.
Kyoichi KairaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center, International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama, 350-1298, Japan.
Kenya KanazawaDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Hirokazu TaniguchiDivision of Respiratory Medicine, Toyama Prefectural Central Hospital, Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Koichi MinatoDivision of Respiratory Medicine, Gunma Prefectural Cancer Center, Ota, Gunma, Japan.
Hiroshi KagamuDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center, International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, 1397-1 Yamane, Hidaka, Saitama, 350-1298, Japan.
Saitama Medical University · JPFukushima Medical University · JPToyama Prefectural Central Hospital · JPHyogo Prefectural Cancer Center · JPIbaraki Prefectural Central Hospital · JPJichi Medical University · JPJichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center · JPSaku Central Hospital · JPTochigi Cancer Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined the activity and safety of amrubicin monotherapy among relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients who had previously been treated with atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide (AteCE). This retrospective study evaluated patients with relapsed SCLC who were treated with previously AteCE combination therapy followed by amrubicin monotherapy between August 2019 and May 2021. Clinical efficacy and toxicity were analyzed. Overall, 40 patients were included: 12 and 28 patients had sensitive and refractory relapse, respectively. The response rate was 32.5% (25.0% in the sensitive group and 35.7% in the refractory group). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from the first amrubicin treatment was 3.4 months (95% CI: 1.9-4.9 months) and 9.9 months (95% CI: 4.5-11.5 months), respectively. There was no significant between-group difference in median PFS (3.6 months vs. 3.2 months, p = 0.42) or median OS (11.2 months vs. 7.3 months, p = 0.78). Grade ≥ 3 hematological adverse events occurred as follows: decreased white blood cells in 52.5% of patients; decreased neutrophil count in 57.5%; and febrile neutropenia in 10.0%. Grade 3 pneumonitis was observed in one patient. There were no treatment-related deaths. Amrubicin is feasible and effective for relapsed SCLC patients previously treated with AteCE therapy. Although immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment (ICI) does not improve the effect of amrubicin, the toxicity is not increased, suggesting that amrubicin remains effective even after ICI administration. Thus, amrubicin after AteCE could be the preferred standard chemotherapeutic choice in patients with relapsed SCLC.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsSmall Cell Lung CarcinomaAnthracyclinesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarboplatinEtoposideHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesamrubicinAnthracyclinesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedatezolizumabCarboplatinEtoposideAmrubicinAtezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposideImmune checkpoint inhibitorRelapsed small-cell lung cancer

Identifiers

PMID35749041
PMCPMC9395483
OpenAlexW4283375393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.