Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35749012›Full record

ArticlePituitary2022

Pituitary stalk interruption syndrome: phenotype, predictors, and pathophysiology of perinatal events.

Chakra Diwaker, Puja Thadani, Saba Samad Memon, Vijaya Sarathi, Anurag Ranjan Lila, Sneha Arya, Brijesh Krishnappa, Manjiri Karlekar, Virendra A Patil, Nalini Shah and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pituitary, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Chakra Diwaker *Department of Endocrinology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400012, India.
Puja Thadani *University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire (UHCW) NHS Trust, Coventry, England, UK.
Saba Samad MemonDepartment of Endocrinology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400012, India.
Vijaya SarathiDepartment of Endocrinology, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Anurag Ranjan LilaDepartment of Endocrinology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400012, India.
Sneha AryaDepartment of Endocrinology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400012, India.
Brijesh KrishnappaDepartment of Endocrinology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400012, India.
Manjiri KarlekarDepartment of Endocrinology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400012, India.
Virendra A PatilDepartment of Endocrinology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400012, India.
Nalini ShahDepartment of Endocrinology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400012, India.
Tushar BandgarDepartment of Endocrinology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400012, India. drtusharb@gmail.com.
King Edward Memorial Hospital and Seth G.S. Medical College · INInstitute of Medical Sciences · INUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere is limited data regarding Pituitary Stalk Interruption Syndrome (PSIS) from India. Moreover, the pathophysiological link between perinatal events and PSIS is unclear. We aim to elucidate the predictors of PSIS among patients with growth hormone deficiency (GHD) and perinatal events in PSIS by comparing cohorts of PSIS and genetically proven GHD without PSIS.

methodsAmong 179 GHD patients, 56 PSIS and 70 genetically positive GHD (52-GHRHR, 15-POU1F1, and 3-PROP1) patients were included. Perinatal events, clinical anomalies, pituitary hormone deficiency, and imaging findings were recorded. We compared PSIS-isolated GHD (PSIS-IGHD) subgroup with GHRHR-IGHD and PSIS-combined pituitary hormone deficiency (PSIS-CPHD) subgroup with POU1F1/PROP1-CPHD.

resultsPSIS patients (45 males, median age: 12.5 years) most commonly presented with short stature. At last follow-up (median age: 17.35 years), gonadal (during pubertal-age), thyroid and cortisol axes were affected in 81.6%, 62.5%, and 62.5%. 10/13 (77%) of PSIS children with initial IGHD diagnosis manifested hypogonadism during pubertal age. Male predominance, sporadic presentation, and clinical anomalies were significantly higher in both PSIS subgroups than in the respective genetic subgroups. Breech presentation was higher in PSIS-CPHD than POU1F1/PROP1-CPHD (44.4% vs 5.5%, p = 0.004). Neonatal hypoglycemia (22% vs. 0%, p = 0.05) and jaundice (42 vs. 5%, p = 0.004) were higher in PSIS-CPHD than PSIS-IGHD.

conclusionLater age at presentation and frequent hypogonadism were observed in our PSIS cohort. Male sex, sporadic presentation, clinical anomalies, and breech presentation predicted PSIS at presentation. Breech presentation in PSIS is likely due to stalk interruption rather than hormonal deficiency.

Indexed as

Breech PresentationDwarfism, PituitaryHypogonadismHypopituitarismFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePhenotypePituitary GlandPregnancyTranscription FactorsTranscription FactorsBreech presentationEctopic posterior pituitaryExtra pituitary malformationPituitary stalk interruption syndrome

Identifiers

PMID35749012
OpenAlexW4283370478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.