ArticleArchives of microbiology2022
Exploring the dynamics of toxigenic environmental Vibrio mimicus and its comparative analysis with Vibrio cholerae of the southern Gangetic delta.
Article in Archives of microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Virulence gene profiles and antimicrobial resistance in clinical and environmental isolates of Non-O1/Non-O139 Vibrio cholerae.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Occurrence and Antibiotic Resistance Risk Burden ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Genetic Characterization of a Novel Retron Element Isolated from Vibrio mimicus.Microbiology and immunology · 2025Article
- Transcriptome reveals the role of theFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vibrio mimicus and Vibrio cholerae are closely related species. Environmental V.mimicus were comparatively analyzed with V.cholerae, for the presence of virulence genes, antibiotic susceptibility, resistance genes, in-vitro hemolysis, and biofilm formation. Phylogenetic analysis was performed depending on toxin-gene disposition and isolation area. One V.mimicus isolate harbored ctxA, tcp El-Tor, toxT and toxS, whereas several strains contained incomplete copies of virulence cassettes and associated toxin genes. V.cholerae isolates harbored ctx, tcp and toxT genes, with a higher preponderance of hlyA, rtxA and toxR genes. V.mimicus were highly sensitive to amino/carboxy-penicillins, furazolidone & gentamycin, with quinolone & tetracycline resistance genes. V.cholerae isolates were sensitive to penicillins and cephalosporins, with 29% of the strains bearing the sxt gene. Phylogenetically, the apomorphic strains of both species were unique to the inland sites. V.cholerae has embodied an enormous public health burden globally but our findings emphasize the role of V.mimicus as an emerging etiological agent with similar epidemic potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.