Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35748935›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2022

Correlation between change in central subfield thickness and change in visual acuity in macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion: post hoc analysis of COPERNICUS, GALILEO, and VIBRANT.

Sophie Z Gu, Onnisa Nanegrungsunk, Susan B Bressler, Weiming Du, Fouad Amer, Hadi Moini, Neil M Bressler

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sophie Z GuJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Onnisa NanegrungsunkRetina Division, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Susan B BresslerRetina Division, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Weiming DuRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Tarrytown, NY, USA.
Fouad AmerRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Tarrytown, NY, USA.
Hadi MoiniRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Tarrytown, NY, USA.
Neil M BresslerRetina Division, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. nmboffice@jhmi.edu.
Johns Hopkins University · USRegeneron (United States) · USChiang Mai University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAssess correlation between change in central subfield thickness (CST) and change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in eyes with macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion (RVO) that received intravitreal aflibercept injections (IAI).

methodsPost hoc analysis of COPERNICUS and GALILEO trials for CRVO and VIBRANT trial for BRVO with relationships determined using Pearson correlation coefficient.

resultsIn COPERNICUS, correlations (r) between change in CST and change in BCVA from baseline at weeks 12, 24, 52, and 100 were -0.36 (95% CI: -0.52, -0.18; P < 0.001), -0.38 (95% CI: -0.53, -0.20; P < 0.001), -0.44 (95% CI: -0.58, -0.27; P < 0.001), and -0.41 (95% CI: -0.56, -0.23; P < 0.001), respectively. CST changes accounted for only 21% of the variance in BCVA changes; every 100-µm decrease in CST was associated with a 2.1-letter increase in BCVA (P = 0.003). Similar findings were noted for GALILEO (r, -0.45 to -0.23) and VIBRANT (r, -0.36 to -0.32) trials.

conclusionIn eyes treated with IAI for macular edema due to RVO, correlation between change in CST and change in BCVA was weak to moderate. While change in CST may be helpful in determining the need for anti-VEGF therapy, these findings do not support using changes in CST as a surrogate for changes in visual acuity outcomes.

Indexed as

Macular EdemaRetinal Vein OcclusionAngiogenesis InhibitorsClinical Trials as TopicHumansIntravitreal InjectionsTreatment OutcomeVisual AcuityAngiogenesis InhibitorsCentral subfield thicknessMacular edemaRetinal vein occlusionVisual acuity

Identifiers

PMID35748935
PMCPMC9666318
OpenAlexW4283455950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.