Antibiotic Use and Stewardship Practices in a Pediatric Community-based Cohort Study in Peru: Shorter Would be Sweeter.

backgroundThere is a need to evaluate antibiotic use, duration of therapy, and stewardship in low- and middle-income countries to guide the development of appropriate stewardship programs that are global in scope and effectively decrease unnecessary antibiotic use.

methodsWe prospectively collected information on illness occurrence and antibiotic use from a cohort of 303 children. We evaluated the incidence, duration of therapy, and appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions by 5 main antibiotic prescribers (physicians and nurses, pharmacists, nursing assistants, self-prescriptions, and neighbors or family members).

resultsNinety percent of children received an antibiotic during follow-up, and on average, by the end of follow-up a child had spent 4.3% of their first 5 years of life on antibiotics. The most frequent prescribers were physicians/nurses (79.4%), followed by pharmacists (8.1%), self-prescriptions (6.8%), nursing assistants (3.7%), and family or neighbors (1.9%). Of the 3702 courses of antibiotics prescribed, 30.9% were done so for the occurrence of fever, 25.3% for diarrhea, 2.8% for acute lower respiratory disease, 2.7% for dysentery, and 38.2% for an undetermined illness. Courses exceeding the recommended duration were common for the principal diseases for which treatment was initiated, with 27.3% of courses exceeding the recommended length duration, representing a potential reduction in 13.2% of days on which this cohort spent on antibiotics.

conclusionsStewardship programs should target medical personnel for a primary care stewardship program even in a context in which antibiotics are available to the public with little or no restrictions and appropriate duration should be emphasized in this training.