ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2022
Validation of a "subjective motoric cognitive risk syndrome" screening tool for motoric cognitive risk syndrome-A prospective cohort study.
Article in European journal of neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome and the Risk of Incident Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.Gerontology · 2024Pooled it
- Development and validation of screening tools for motoric cognitive risk syndrome in community settings.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Trial
- A nomogram-based prediction model for motoric cognitive risk syndrome in patients with coronary artery disease: a cross-sectional study.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2025Article
- Daily Diary Smartphone Assessment of Subjective Cognitive Concerns in Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome: A Pilot Study.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Motoric cognitive risk syndrome: A review of fall risk assessment and management strategies.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Review
- Improving Early Dementia Detection Among Diverse Older Adults With Cognitive Concerns With the 5-Cog Paradigm: Protocol for a Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Clinical Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Electrocardiographic markers in Motoric Cognitive Risk syndrome.Gerontology · 2025Article
- Subjective motoric cognitive risk syndrome: Preliminary prevalence from an online survey of a German cohort aged 50.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2025Article
- Chinese validation of "subjective motoric cognitive risk syndrome" screening tool in patients with coronary artery disease using Rasch analysis.Frontiers in aging · 2025Article
- Evaluation criteria for diagnosing motoric cognitive risk syndrome: a scoping review.Dementia & neuropsychologia · 2025Review
- Association between Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome and Indicators of Reflecting Independent Living among Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Japan: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Multi-trajectories in different domains of social supports and subjective motoric cognitive risk syndrome: a 16-year group-based multi-trajectory analysis.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2024Article
- Predictors for the development of motoric cognitive risk syndrome in older adults.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- "Cognitive" Criteria in Older Adults With Slow Gait Speed: Implications for Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2024Review
- A feasibility randomized controlled trial of a community-level physical activity strategy for older adults with motoric cognitive risk syndrome.Frontiers in aging · 2024Article
- [Motoric cognitive risk syndrome-Setting the course for dementia prevention?]Der Nervenarzt · 2023Review
- Epidemiology of Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome in the Kerala Einstein Study: Protocol for a Prospective Cohort Study.JMIR research protocols · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeMotoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR) is a gait-based pre-dementia syndrome associated with risk of dementia. Ascertaining subjective cognitive and motoric complaints may facilitate early and remote identification of individuals with MCR as they are reported to precede and predict objective cognitive and motoric impairments in aging.
methodsThe validity of five subjective motoric complaint (SMC) questions and 10 subjective cognitive complaint (SCC) questions was examined for discriminating MCR in 538 non-demented community-dwelling adults. Backward logistic regression was used to identify questions to develop a weighted score to define subjective MCR (MCR-S). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was applied to determine the discriminative ability of MCR-S for the objective MCR (MCR-O) definition based on SCCs and objectively measured gait. Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for potential confounders were used to examine the predictive validity of MCR-S for incident dementia.
resultsFive subjective complaint questions (three SCC and two SMC) were associated with MCR-O. They were combined to define an MCR-S score (range 0-7) which yielded an area under the curve of 0.89 for discriminating MCR-O from receiver operating characteristic analysis. An optimal cut-score of 2 on the MCR-S score was determined to have good sensitivity (84%) and specificity (82%) for MCR-O. Over a median follow-up of 2.5 years, 29 participants developed dementia. Both MCR-S (adjusted hazard ratio 2.39) and MCR-O at baseline (adjusted hazard ratio 3.16) predicted risk of incident dementia.
conclusionsSubjective MCR had high concordance with MCR-O and can provide a remote screening assessment for MCR-O, which can identify those at high risk for dementia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.