Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35748667›Full record

ReviewIntegrated environmental assessment and management2023

Integrative monitoring strategy for marine and freshwater harmful algal blooms and toxins across the freshwater-to-marine continuum.

Meredith D A Howard, Jayme Smith, David A Caron, Raphael M Kudela, Keith Loftin, Kendra Hayashi, Rich Fadness, Susan Fricke, Jacob Kann, Miranda Roethler and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Integrated environmental assessment and management, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Meredith D A HowardCentral Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board, Rancho Cordova, California, USA.
Jayme SmithSouthern California Coastal Water Research Project, Costa Mesa, California, USA.
David A CaronUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Raphael M KudelaUniversity of California, Santa Cruz, California, USA.
Keith LoftinU.S. Geological Survey, Kansas Water Science Center, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.
Kendra HayashiUniversity of California, Santa Cruz, California, USA.
Rich FadnessNorth Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Rosa, California, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9627-1566
Susan FrickeKaruk Tribe, Happy Camp, California, USA.
Jacob KannAquatic Ecosystem Sciences, Ashland, Oregon, USA.
Miranda RoethlerUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Avery TattersU.S. Environmental Protection Agency Gulf Ecosystem Measurement and Modeling Division Laboratory, Gulf Breeze, Florida, USA.
Susanna TherouxSouthern California Coastal Water Research Project, Costa Mesa, California, USA.

Funding

Center for Sponsored Coastal Ocean Research NA15NOS4780177Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many coastal states throughout the USA have observed negative effects in marine and estuarine environments caused by cyanotoxins produced in inland waterbodies that were transported downstream or produced in the estuaries. Estuaries and other downstream receiving waters now face the dual risk of impacts from harmful algal blooms (HABs) that occur in the coastal ocean as well as those originating in inland watersheds. Despite this risk, most HAB monitoring efforts do not account for hydrological connections in their monitoring strategies and designs. Monitoring efforts in California have revealed the persistent detection of cyanotoxins across the freshwater-to-marine continuum. These studies underscore the importance of inland waters as conduits for the transfer of cyanotoxins to the marine environment and highlight the importance of approaches that can monitor across hydrologically connected waterbodies. A HAB monitoring strategy is presented for the freshwater-to-marine continuum to inform HAB management and mitigation efforts and address the physical and hydrologic challenges encountered when monitoring in these systems. Three main recommendations are presented based on published studies, new datasets, and existing monitoring programs. First, HAB monitoring would benefit from coordinated and cohesive efforts across hydrologically interconnected waterbodies and across organizational and political boundaries and jurisdictions. Second, a combination of sampling modalities would provide the most effective monitoring for HAB toxin dynamics and transport across hydrologically connected waterbodies, from headwater sources to downstream receiving waterbodies. Third, routine monitoring is needed for toxin mixtures at the land-sea interface including algal toxins of marine origins as well as cyanotoxins that are sourced from inland freshwater or produced in estuaries. Case studies from California are presented to illustrate the implementation of these recommendations, but these recommendations can also be applied to inland states or regions where the downstream receiving waterbody is a freshwater lake, reservoir, or river. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2023;19:586-604. © 2022 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).

Indexed as

Harmful Algal BloomLakesCyanobacteria ToxinsEstuariesRiversCyanobacteria ToxinsCyanotoxinsEnvironmental monitoringHAB managementHarmful algal blooms

Identifiers

PMID35748667
PMCPMC11539047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.