Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35748642›Full record

Trial reportNeuropsychopharmacology reports2022

Residual effects of low dose of suvorexant, zolpidem, and ramelteon in healthy elderly subjects: A randomized double-blind study.

Sachiko Ito Uemura, Aya Imanishi, Yoshino Terui, Insung Park, Masahiro Satake, GoEun Han, Takanobu Shioya, Takashi Kanbayashi, Seiji Nishino

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuropsychopharmacology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sachiko Ito UemuraDepartment of Physical Therapy, Akita University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Akita, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6073-6795
Aya ImanishiDepartment of Psychiatry, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
Yoshino TeruiDepartment of Physical Therapy, Akita University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Akita, Japan.
Insung ParkInternational Institute for Integrative Sleep Medicine (WPI-IIIS), University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Masahiro SatakeDepartment of Physical Therapy, Akita University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Akita, Japan.
GoEun HanInternational Institute for Integrative Sleep Medicine (WPI-IIIS), University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Takanobu ShioyaNikoniko-en, Long-Term Care Health Facilities, Akita, Japan.
Takashi KanbayashiInternational Institute for Integrative Sleep Medicine (WPI-IIIS), University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9205-007X
Seiji NishinoSleep & Circadian Neurobiology Laboratory, Stanford Sleep Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Akita University · JPUniversity of Tsukuba · JPAkebono (Japan) · JPStanford Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCurrent hypnotic agents have next-day residual effects. The new orexin antagonist, suvorexant, has little muscle relaxation effect on the physical and cognitive function in the following morning and daytime. In this study, the effects of suvorexant, zolpidem, ramelteon and placebo in elderly subjects were evaluated.

methodsSix men and eight women aged 63-75 years received a single tablet and lights were then turned off. Subjects were instructed to sleep from 23:00-6:00 with an interruption from 4:00-4:30 for evaluations. Suvorexant 10 mg, zolpidem 5 mg, ramelteon 4 mg or placebo was administered single time in a randomized, double-blind and crossover design with a one-week drug holiday in between each drug. Measures of objective parameters and subjective ratings were obtained every 2 h from 4:00 to 16:00.

resultNo subjects showed serious side effects from physical observations and vital sign checks before and after hypnotics were taken. During the first sleep period, the REM sleep time with suvorexant was especially longer than that with zolpidem. During the second sleep period, suvorexant had shorter sleep latency and longer stage2 sleep time than ramelteon and zolpidem, respectively. During the whole entire sleep, the REM sleep time with suvorexant was longer than zolpidem and placebo. For the body sway test with closed eye, the main effects of the medicines and zolpidem were significantly better than suvorexant and ramelteon.

conclusionThe changes of physical and cognitive functions in healthy elderly after taking hypnotics were not remarkable. Therefore, these three hypnotics maybe appropriate for the elderly people with insomnia for single-time low dose administration.

Indexed as

Hypnotics and SedativesAgedAzepinesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansIndenesMaleOrexinsTriazolesZolpidemAzepinesHypnotics and SedativesIndenesOrexinsramelteonsuvorexantTriazolesZolpidemhypnoticsresidual effectssleepsuvorexantzolpidem

Identifiers

PMID35748642
PMCPMC9515713
OpenAlexW4283447572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.