Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35748241›Full record

ArticleCirculation2022

Socioeconomic Deprivation: An Important, Largely Unrecognized Risk Factor in Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease.

Dorien M Kimenai, Leah Pirondini, John Gregson, David Prieto, Stuart J Pocock, Pablo Perel, Tilly Hamilton, Paul Welsh, Archie Campbell, David J Porteous and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
13.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Dorien M Kimenai *British Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science (D. M.K., T.H., N.L.M.), University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1591-1352
Leah Pirondini *Department of Medical Statistics (L.P., J.G., S.J.P.), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom.
John GregsonDepartment of Medical Statistics (L.P., J.G., S.J.P.), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom.
David PrietoDepartment of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology (D.P., P.P., A.S.V.S.), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5001-0061
Stuart J PocockDepartment of Medical Statistics (L.P., J.G., S.J.P.), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom.
Pablo PerelDepartment of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology (D.P., P.P., A.S.V.S.), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom.
Tilly HamiltonBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science (D. M.K., T.H., N.L.M.), University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Paul WelshInstitute of Cardiovascular & Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom (P.W., N.S.).ORCID 0000-0002-7970-3643
Archie CampbellCentre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine (A.C., D.J.P.), University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0198-5078
David J PorteousCentre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine (A.C., D.J.P.), University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1249-6106
Caroline HaywardMedical Research Council Human Genetics Unit (C.H.), University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9405-9550
Naveed SattarInstitute of Cardiovascular & Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom (P.W., N.S.).ORCID 0000-0002-1604-2593
Nicholas L MillsBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science (D. M.K., T.H., N.L.M.), University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0533-7991
Anoop S V ShahDepartment of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology (D.P., P.P., A.S.V.S.), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2825-3419
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBBritish Heart Foundation · GBCenter for Genomic Science · ITEdinburgh Cancer Research · GBInstitute of Genetics and Cancer · GBJohnson & Johnson (United Kingdom) · GBThe Welding Institute · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation CH/F/21/90010British Heart Foundation FS/19/17/34172British Heart Foundation RE/18/5/34216British Heart Foundation RG/20/10/34966Medical Research Council MC_UU_00007/10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocioeconomic deprivation is associated with higher cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Whether deprivation status should be incorporated in more cardiovascular risk estimation scores remains unclear. This study evaluates how socioeconomic deprivation status affects the performance of 3 primary prevention cardiovascular risk scores.

methodsThe Generation Scotland Scottish Family Health Study was used to evaluate the performance of 3 cardiovascular risk scores with (ASSIGN [Assessing cardiovascular risk using SIGN (Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network) guidelines to ASSIGN preventive treatment]) and without (SCORE2 [Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation 2 algorithm], Pooled Cohort Equations) socioeconomic deprivation as a covariate in the risk prediction model. Deprivation was defined by Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation score. The predicted 10-year risk was evaluated against the observed event rate for the cardiovascular outcome of each risk score. The comparison was made across 3 groups defined by the deprivation index score consisting of group 1 defined as most deprived, group 3 defined as least deprived, and group 2, which consisted of individuals in the middle deprivation categories.

resultsThe study population consisted of 15 506 individuals (60.0% female, median age of 51). Across the population, 1808 (12%) individuals were assigned to group 1 (most deprived), 8119 (52%) to group 2, and 4708 (30%) to group 3 (least deprived), and 871 (6%) individuals had a missing deprivation score. Risk scores based on models that did not include deprivation status significantly under predicted risk in the most deprived (6.43% observed versus 4.63% predicted for SCORE2 [

conclusionsSocioeconomic status is a largely unrecognized risk factor in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Risk scores that exclude socioeconomic deprivation as a covariate under- and overestimate the risk in the most and least deprived individuals, respectively. This study highlights the importance of incorporating socioeconomic deprivation status in risk estimation systems to ultimately reduce inequalities in health care provision for cardiovascular disease.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMalePrimary PreventionRisk FactorsSocial ClassSocioeconomic Factorscalibrationcardiovascular diseaserisk assessmentsocial class

Identifiers

PMID35748241
PMCPMC9287096
OpenAlexW4283447493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.