ArticleDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)2022
Indeterminate pulmonary subsolid nodules in patients with no history of cancer: growing prediction, CT pattern, and pathological diagnosis.
Article in Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of risk factors in persistent subsolid pulmonary nodules based on CT dynamic follow-up.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Correlation between CT growth patterns and invasiveness progression in neoplastic subcentimeter sub-solid nodules.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- Predicting the invasiveness of pulmonary adenocarcinoma using intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics features.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Clinical value of peripheral blood miR-21 and miR-486 combined with CT forearly cancer diagnosis in pulmonary nodulessmoking.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2024Article
- Diagnostic challenge and survival analysis of pulmonary oligometastases and primary lung cancer in breast cancer patients.Thoracic cancer · 2024Article
- Detection of subsolid nodules on chest CT scans during the COVID-19 pandemic.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2024Article
- Letter to the Editor: Indeterminate pulmonary subsolid nodules in patients with no history of cancer.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2023Article
- Long-term follow-up of persistent pulmonary subsolid nodules: Natural course of pure, heterogeneous, and real part-solid ground-glass nodules.Thoracic cancer · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to evaluate and compare the growth patterns among pathological types of inde- terminate subsolid nodules in patients without a history of cancer as observed on computed tomography (CT). METHODS This retrospective study included 77 consecutive patients with 80 indeterminate subsolid nod- ules on unenhanced thin-section CT. Subsolid nodules were classified into 2 growth pattern groups based on volume: growth (n = 35) and non-growth (n = 42). According to the pathologi- cal diagnosis, subsolid nodules were further subdivided into 3 groups: adenocarcinoma in situ (growth, n = 8 vs. non-growth, n = 22), minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (n = 14 vs. n = 15), and invasive adenocarcinoma (n=13 vs. n=5). Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regres- sion analyses were performed to identify the risk factors for subsolid nodules growth. The CT findings of the 35 subsolid nodules in the growth group were compared among the 3 pathologi- cal groups. RESULTS In the growth group, the overall mean volume doubling time and mass doubling time (MDT) were 811.5 days and 616.5 days, respectively. Patient's age (odds ratio=1.041, P=.045) and CT subtype of non-solid nodule and part-solid nodule (odds ratio=3.430, P=.002) could predict subsolid nodule growth. The baseline volume, mass, and mean CT value were larger in the inva- sive adenocarcinoma group than in the adenocarcinoma in situ group (all P < .01). The shortest volume doubling time was observed in the invasive adenocarcinoma group, followed by the minimally invasive adenocarcinoma group and the adenocarcinoma in situ group. A shorter mass doubling time was observed in the minimally invasive adenocarcinoma group than in the adenocarcinoma in situ group (all P < .02). CONCLUSION As age increases, the risk of pulmonary subsolid nodule growth increases by 4% each year, and part-solid nodules have a 3 times higher risk of growth compared to non-solid nodules in patients with no history of cancer. Subsolid nodules with more aggressive pathological charac- teristics grow at a faster rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.