Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35748205›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)2022

Indeterminate pulmonary subsolid nodules in patients with no history of cancer: growing prediction, CT pattern, and pathological diagnosis.

Xiaowan Guo, Xudong Jia, Danqing Zhang, Hui Feng, Yana Dou, Gaofeng Shi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Detection of subsolid nodules on chest CT scans during the COVID-19 pandemic.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiaowan GuoDepartment of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance, Hebei Medical University Fourth Affiliated Hospital and Hebei Provincial Tumor Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China; Department of Radiology, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China.
Xudong JiaDepartments of Urology, Hebei Medical University No2 Hospital: Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China.
Danqing ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China.
Hui FengDepartment of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance, Hebei Medical University Fourth Affiliated Hospital and Hebei Provincial Tumor Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China.
Yana DouSiemens Healthineers, Beijing, Shanghai, China.
Gaofeng ShiDepartment of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance, Hebei Medical University Fourth Affiliated Hospital and Hebei Provincial Tumor Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China.
Hebei Medical University · CNHebei General Hospital · CNSiemens Healthcare (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PURPOSE We aimed to evaluate and compare the growth patterns among pathological types of inde- terminate subsolid nodules in patients without a history of cancer as observed on computed tomography (CT). METHODS This retrospective study included 77 consecutive patients with 80 indeterminate subsolid nod- ules on unenhanced thin-section CT. Subsolid nodules were classified into 2 growth pattern groups based on volume: growth (n = 35) and non-growth (n = 42). According to the pathologi- cal diagnosis, subsolid nodules were further subdivided into 3 groups: adenocarcinoma in situ (growth, n = 8 vs. non-growth, n = 22), minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (n = 14 vs. n = 15), and invasive adenocarcinoma (n=13 vs. n=5). Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regres- sion analyses were performed to identify the risk factors for subsolid nodules growth. The CT findings of the 35 subsolid nodules in the growth group were compared among the 3 pathologi- cal groups. RESULTS In the growth group, the overall mean volume doubling time and mass doubling time (MDT) were 811.5 days and 616.5 days, respectively. Patient's age (odds ratio=1.041, P=.045) and CT subtype of non-solid nodule and part-solid nodule (odds ratio=3.430, P=.002) could predict subsolid nodule growth. The baseline volume, mass, and mean CT value were larger in the inva- sive adenocarcinoma group than in the adenocarcinoma in situ group (all P < .01). The shortest volume doubling time was observed in the invasive adenocarcinoma group, followed by the minimally invasive adenocarcinoma group and the adenocarcinoma in situ group. A shorter mass doubling time was observed in the minimally invasive adenocarcinoma group than in the adenocarcinoma in situ group (all P < .02). CONCLUSION As age increases, the risk of pulmonary subsolid nodule growth increases by 4% each year, and part-solid nodules have a 3 times higher risk of growth compared to non-solid nodules in patients with no history of cancer. Subsolid nodules with more aggressive pathological charac- teristics grow at a faster rate.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdenocarcinoma in SituAdenocarcinoma of LungLung NeoplasmsMultiple Pulmonary NodulesHumansRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID35748205
PMCPMC9634916
OpenAlexW4223966199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.