ArticleDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)2022
Digital breast tomosynthesis-based peritumoral radiomics approaches in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.
Article in Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnosing breast masses in BI-RADS 4: construction and interpretation of an intralesional and perilesional radiomics nomogram based on digital breast tomosynthesis.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Predictive value of 18F-FDG PET/CT delta radiomics model for prognosis after neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- DBT-based habitat imaging for differentiating benign and malignant breast architectural distortion : a two-center study.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Multi-modality radiomics diagnosis of breast cancer based on MRI, ultrasound and mammography.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Deep Learning in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Trends.MedComm · 2025Review
- Intra- and peri-tumoral radiomics based on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for prediction of benign disease in BI-RADS 4 breast lesions: a multicentre study.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- The value of multiparametric MRI radiomics and machine learning in predicting preoperative Ki-67 expression level in breast cancer.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Differentiating Lung Adenocarcinoma from Tuberculous Nodules in HIV/AIDS Patients Using Preoperative CT-Based Intratumoral and Peritumoral Radiomics Combined with Clinical Features.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- An updated overview of radiomics-based artificial intelligence (AI) methods in breast cancer screening and diagnosis.Radiological physics and technology · 2024Review
- Dynamic contrast-enhanced mammography and breast MRI in the diagnosis of breast cancer and detection of tumor size.Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2024Article
- Predicting Ki-67 expression levels in breast cancer using radiomics-based approaches on digital breast tomosynthesis and ultrasound.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Radiomics nomogram based on digital breast tomosynthesis: preoperative evaluation of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast carcinoma.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Clinical-radiomic models based on digital breast tomosynthesis images: a preliminary investigation of a predictive tool for cancer diagnosis.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Developing a weakly supervised deep learning framework for breast cancer diagnosis with HR status based on mammography images.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to evaluate digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT)-based radiomics in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions in women. METHODS A total of 185 patients who underwent DBT scans were enrolled between December 2017 and June 2019. The features of handcrafted and deep learning-based radiomics were extracted from the tumoral and peritumoral regions with different radial dilation distances outside the tumor. A 3-step method was used to select discriminative features and develop the radiomics signature. Discriminative clinical factors were identified by univariate logistic regression. The clinical fac- tors with P < .05 were used to build a clinical model with multivariate logistic regression. The radiomics nomogram was developed by integrating the radiomics signature and discriminative clinical factors. Discriminative performance of the radiomics signature, clinical model, nomo- gram, and breast imaging reporting and data system assessment were evaluated and compared with the receiver operating characteristic and decision curves analysis (DCA). RESULTS A total of 2 handcrafted and 2 deep features were identified as the most discriminative features from the peritumoral regions with 2 mm dilation distances and used to develop the radiomics signature. The nomogram incorporating the radiomics signature, age, and menstruation status showed the best discriminative performance with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.980 (95% CI, 0.960 to 1.000; sensitivity =0.970, specificity =0.946) in the training cohort and 0.985 (95% CI, 0.960 to 1.000; sensitivity = 0.909, specificity = 0.966) in the validation cohort. DCA con- firmed the potential clinical usefulness of our nomogram. CONCLUSION Our results illustrate that the radiomics nomogram integrating the DBT imaging features and clinical factors (age and menstruation status) can be considered as a useful tool in aiding the clinical diagnosis of breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.