Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35748202›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)2022

Differentiation of adrenal adenomas from adrenal metastases in single-phased staging dual-energy CT and radiomics.

Moritz T Winkelmann, Sebastian Gassenmaier, Sven S Walter, Christoph Artzner, Felix Lades, Sebastian Faby, Konstantin Nikolaou, Malte N Bongers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Dual-Energy CT in Oncologic Imaging.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Moritz T WinkelmannDepartment for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Sebastian GassenmaierDepartment for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Sven S WalterDepartment for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Christoph ArtznerDepartment for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Felix LadesSiemens Healthcare GmbH, Forchheim, Germany.
Sebastian FabySiemens Healthcare GmbH, Forchheim, Germany.
Konstantin NikolaouDepartment for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Malte N BongersDepartment for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PURPOSE Differentiation of incidental adrenal lesions remains a challenge in diagnostic imaging, especially on single-phase portal venous computed tomography (CT) in the oncological setting. The aim of the study was to explore the ability of dual-energy CT (DECT)-based iodine quantification and virtual non-contrast (VNC) imaging and advanced radiomic analysis of DECT for differentiation of adrenal adenomas from metastases. METHODS A total of 46 patients with 49 adrenal lesions underwent clinically indicated staging DECT and magnetic resonance imaging. Median values of quantitative parameters such as VNC, fat frac- tion, and iodine density in DECT images were collected and compared between adenomas and metastases using non-parametric tests. Magnetic resonance imaging, washout CT, and clinical follow-up were used as a reference standard. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed by calculat- ing receiver operating characteristics. A DECT tumor analysis prototype software was used for semiautomatic segmentation of adrenal lesions and extraction of radiomic features. A radiomics prototype was used to analyze the data with multiple logistic regression and random forest clas- sification to determine the area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS The study cohort (60.87% women; mean age: 66.91 ± 12.93 years) consisted of 32 adenomas and 17 metastases. DECT-based VNC imaging (AUC=0.89) and fat quantification (AUC=0.86) differentiate between adrenal adenomas and metastases with high diagnostic accuracy (P < .001). Analysis of radiomic features revealed that DECT features such as VNC imaging and fat fraction (AUC = 0.87-0.89; < .001) and radiomic features such as 90th percentile and total energy (AUC = 0.88-0.93; P < .001) differentiate with high diagnostic accuracy between adrenal adeno- mas and metastases. Random forest classification revealed an AUC of 0.83 for separating adrenal adenomas from metastases. CONCLUSION Virtual non-contrast imaging and fat quantification as well as extraction of radiomic features accurately differentiate between adrenal adenomas and metastases on single-phase oncologic staging DECT.

Indexed as

AdenomaAdrenal Gland NeoplasmsIodineAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesROC CurveTomography, X-Ray ComputedIodine

Identifiers

PMID35748202
PMCPMC9634920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.