ArticleACR open rheumatology2022
EMBRACE: One Small Story in Lupus-One Giant Challenge in Clinical Trials.
Article in ACR open rheumatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diversity in clinical Trials: The example of systemic lupus erythematosus.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2026Article
- "What do you want this information for?": cognitive interviews with arthritis researchers to inform the development of a health equity-focused demographic survey for outcomes research.BMC rheumatology · 2026Article
- Racial differences in clinical trial perceptions among a large, predominantly Black cohort of people with systemic lupus erythematosus in the Southeastern USA.Lupus science & medicine · 2025Article
- Subtype and Racial Erythema Variation for Cutaneous Lupus Trials.JAMA dermatology · 2025Article
- Patients achieving low lupus disease activity state, systemic lupus erythematosus disease control or remission showed lower rates of organ damage during longitudinal follow-up: analysis of the Hopkins Lupus Cohort.Lupus science & medicine · 2024Article
- The Explication of Race in Rheumatology Disparities.Arthritis care & research · 2024Article
- Clarity for the language of race, ethnicity and genetic ancestry in rheumatology.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2024Article
- Article
- Geographic and Demographic Representation in Industry-Sponsored, US-Based Clinical Trials of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Therapies.The Journal of rheumatology · 2024Article
- Clinical trial outcomes for SLE: what we have and what we need.Lupus science & medicine · 2024Review
- Feasibility and Utility of a Pilot Peer Education Program to Improve Patient Engagement in Lupus Clinical Trials: Implementation and Evaluation in a Multisite Model Within a Lupus Clinical Trials Network.ACR open rheumatology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical trials of novel therapeutics in the United States have not been adequately representative of diverse populations, particularly racial and ethnic minorities. The challenges and consequences of underrepresentation in clinical trial recruitment are exemplified by the case of belimumab, a biologic treatment for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), a disease that is more prevalent in patients of Black African ancestry and of Hispanic/Latino ethnicity than in other patient populations. Although belimumab was found to be effective in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials in the general population, post hoc analyses of efficacy data in patients of Black African ancestry showed inconsistent results. Consequently, a cautionary statement regarding belimumab use in this population was added to the product label. To alleviate concerns that belimumab may not be safe and effective for patients of Black African ancestry, the Efficacy and Safety of Belimumab in Black Race Patients with SLE (EMBRACE) study was conducted in a post-marketing commitment to the Food and Drug Administration. The study recruited only patients who self-identified as being of Black race; its findings led to the removal of the cautionary labeling of belimumab use in patients of Black African ancestry. Our manuscript highlights the critical lessons learned from the successes and failures of the EMBRACE study. It also provides suggestions for overcoming health disparities, highlighting strategies for conducting well-designed clinical trials to overcome systematic barriers to diversity in recruitment, with a focus on enacting long-term support to ensure equity in the process, products, and benefits from drug development and clinical trials.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.