ArticleESC heart failure2022
Experience with the potassium binder patiromer in hyperkalaemia management in heart failure patients in real life.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Management of hyperkalaemia in the Italian clinical practice: impact of diverse potassium binders on outcomes and costs in patients with chronic kidney disease and heart failure.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Hyperkalemia management in heart failure and chronic kidney disease: a Spanish cost-effectiveness analysis of patiromer informed by the integrated DIAMOND trial and real-world evidence.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Patiromer for Patients With Heart Failure at Risk of Hyperkalemia: CARE-HK in HF Registry.Journal of cardiac failure · 2026Article
- Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate Duration and Hyperkalemia-Related Healthcare Encounters in Patients with Heart Failure and Cardio/Renal Dysfunction: The GALVANIZE Outcome Study.Drugs - real world outcomes · 2025Article
- Outcomes and Resource Utilization in Hyperkalemic Emergency Department Patients Treated With Patiromer or Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2025Article
- Hyperkalemia management: a multidisciplinary expert panel's perspective on the role of new potassium binders.Heart failure reviews · 2025Review
- Impact of chronic potassium binder treatment on the clinical outcomes in patients with hyperkalemia: Results of a nationwide hospital-based cohort study.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- Experience with the potassium binder patiromer in hyperkalaemia management in heart failure patients in real life.ESC heart failure · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsHyperkalaemia (HK) is common in heart failure (HF) patients, related to renal dysfunction and medical treatment. It limits medical therapy optimization, which impacts prognosis. New potassium (K) binders help control HK, allowing better medical management of HF. METHODS AND
resultsA retrospective multicentre register included all outpatients with HF and HK (K ≥ 5.1 mEq/L) treated with patiromer according to current recommendations. We evaluated analytic and clinical parameters before starting the treatment and at 7, 30 and 90 days, as well as adverse events related to patiromer and treatment optimization. We included 74 patients (71.6% male) with a mean age of 70.8 years (SD 9.2). Sixty-seven patients (90.5%) presented HK in the previous year. Forty patients (54.1%) underwent down-titration of a renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitor (RAASi) or a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA), and 27 (36.5%) stopped any of them due to HK. Initial K was 5.5 mEq/L (SD 0.6), with a significantly reduction at 7 days (4.9 mEq/L (SD 0.8); P < 0.001), maintained at 90 days (4.9 mEq/L (SD 0.8); P < 0.001). There were no other electrolyte disturbances, with a slight improvement in renal function [glomerular filtration rate 39.6 mL/min (SD 20.4) to 42.7 mL/min (SD 23.2); P = 0.005]. Adverse events were reported in 33.9% of patients, the most common being hypomagnesaemia (16.3%), gastrointestinal disturbances (14.9%) and HK (2.8%). Withdrawal of patiromer was uncommon (12.2%) due to gastrointestinal disturbances in 66.7% of cases. Nine patients (12.2%) started on a RAASi, and 15 patients (20.3%) on an MRA during the follow-up. Forty-five patients (60.8%) increased the dose of RAASi or MRA, increasing to target doses in 5.4 and 10.8% of patients, respectively. At 90 days, NTproBNP values were reduced from 2509.5 pg/mL [IQR 1311-4,249] to 1396.0 pg/mL [IQR 804-4263]; P = 0.003, but the reduction was only observed in those who optimized HF medical treatment [NTproBNP from 1950.5 pg/mL (IQR 1208-3403) to 1349.0 pg/mL (IQR 804-2609); P < 0.01]. NYHA functional class only improved in 7.5% of patients, corresponding with those who optimized HF medical treatment. Compared with the previous 3 months before patiromer treatment, the rate of hospitalization was reduced from 28.4 to 10.9% (P < 0.01), and the emergency room visits from 18.9 to 5.4% (P < 0.01).
conclusionsIn a real-life cohort of patients with HF, patiromer reduced and maintained K levels during 3 months of follow-up. The most common adverse events were hypomagnesaemia and gastrointestinal disturbances. Patiromer helps optimize medical treatment, increasing the percentage of patients treated with RAASi and MRA at target doses. At the end of follow-up, natriuretic peptides values and hospital visits were reduced, suggesting the benefit of optimizing HF medical treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.