SynthesisESC heart failure2022
Exercise haemodynamics in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in ESC heart failure, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exercise haemodynamics in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.ESC heart failure · 2022Pooled it
- Heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: pathophysiology, clinical assessment, and management of exercise intolerance.European heart journal · 2026Review
- Multi-Organ Physiologic Deficits During Exercise Identify Clinical and Molecular Predisposition to Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.Circulation · 2026Article
- Novel markers of myocardial recovery in patients with left ventricular assist device: A cardiopulmonary exercise test and hemodynamic analysis.JHLT open · 2026Article
- Coronary microvascular dysfunction in HFpEF: pathophysiologic mechanisms, diagnosis, treatments, and the amplifying potential of sepsis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Correlation between the extracellular volume fraction and hemodynamic parameters in light-chain cardiac amyloidosis patients.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Left atrial shunting devices: why, what, how, and… when?Heart failure reviews · 2025Review
- Invasive haemodynamic assessment in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.ESC heart failure · 2025Review
- Exercise cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial dynamic index: A non-invasive imaging marker associated with cardiac dyspnea.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2025Article
- Haemodynamic validation of the three-step HFA-PEFF algorithm to diagnose heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.ESC heart failure · 2023Article
- Pulmonary artery wedge pressure and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure during exercise in patients with dyspnoea.ERJ open research · 2023Article
- Correction.ESC heart failure · 2023Article
- Impact of severe secondary tricuspid regurgitation on rest and exercise hemodynamics of patients with heart failure and a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrection.2023
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsExercise right heart catheterization (RHC) is considered the gold-standard test to diagnose heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, exercise RHC is an insufficiently standardized technique, and current haemodynamic thresholds to define HFpEF are not universally accepted. We sought to describe the exercise haemodynamics profile of HFpEF cohorts reported in literature, as compared with control subjects. METHODS AND
resultsWe performed a systematic literature review until December 2020. Studies reporting pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) at rest and peak exercise were extracted. Summary estimates of all haemodynamic variables were evaluated, stratified according to body position (supine/upright exercise). The PAWP/cardiac output (CO) slope during exercise was extrapolated. Twenty-seven studies were identified, providing data for 2180 HFpEF patients and 682 controls. At peak exercise, patients with HFpEF achieved higher PAWP (30 [29-31] vs. 16 [15-17] mmHg, P < 0.001) and mean right atrial pressure (P < 0.001) than controls. These differences persisted after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, and body position. However, peak PAWP values were highly heterogeneous among the cohorts (I
conclusionsDespite methodological heterogeneity, as well as heterogeneity of pooled haemodynamic estimates, the exercise haemodynamic profile of HFpEF patients is consistent across studies and characterized by a steep PAWP rise during exercise. More standardization of exercise haemodynamics may be advisable for a wider application in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.