ArticleYonsei medical journal2022
Machine Learning Model for Classifying the Results of Fetal Cardiotocography Conducted in High-Risk Pregnancies.
Article in Yonsei medical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- High-risk pregnancy prediction using Taguchi-optimized machine learning methods and TOPSIS-based model selection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Advancing Precision Oncology Through Modeling of Longitudinal and Multimodal Data.IEEE reviews in biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Antepartum fetal monitoring in pregnant women with diabetes: A systematic review.Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Generational Leaps in Intrapartum Fetal Surveillance.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Impact of Depressive Symptoms during the Second Trimester of Pregnancy on Maternal and Fetal Heart Rate Variability.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025Article
- Article
- Fetal Health Prediction From Cardiotocography Recordings Using Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2025Article
- Machine learning and disease prediction in obstetrics.Current research in physiology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeFetal well-being is usually assessed via fetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring during the antepartum period. However, the interpretation of FHR is a complex and subjective process with low reliability. This study developed a machine learning model that can classify fetal cardiotocography results as normal or abnormal. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn total, 17492 fetal cardiotocography results were obtained from Ajou University Hospital and 100 fetal cardiotocography results from Czech Technical University and University Hospital in Brno. Board-certified physicians then reviewed the fetal cardiotocography results and labeled 1456 of them as gold-standard; these results were used to train and validate the model. The remaining results were used to validate the clinical effectiveness of the model with the actual outcome.
resultsIn a test dataset, our model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.89 and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) of 0.73 in an internal validation dataset. An average AUROC of 0.73 and average AUPRC of 0.40 were achieved in the external validation dataset. Fetus abnormality score, as calculated from the continuous fetal cardiotocography results, was significantly associated with actual clinical outcomes [intrauterine growth restriction: odds ratio, 3.626 (
conclusionThe machine learning model developed in this study showed precision in classifying FHR signals. This suggests that the model can be applied to medical devices as a screening tool for monitoring fetal status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.