Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35748081›Full record

ArticleYonsei medical journal2022

Machine Learning Model for Classifying the Results of Fetal Cardiotocography Conducted in High-Risk Pregnancies.

Tae Jun Park, Hye Jin Chang, Byung Jin Choi, Jung Ah Jung, Seongwoo Kang, Seokyoung Yoon, Miran Kim, Dukyong Yoon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Yonsei medical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Generational Leaps in Intrapartum Fetal Surveillance.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Impact of Depressive Symptoms during the Second Trimester of Pregnancy on Maternal and Fetal Heart Rate Variability.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Fetal Health Prediction From Cardiotocography Recordings Using Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Machine learning and disease prediction in obstetrics.Current research in physiology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tae Jun Park *Department of Biomedical Informatics, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9053-8178
Hye Jin Chang *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1122-1269
Byung Jin ChoiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1445-5888
Jung Ah JungDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4312-7354
Seongwoo KangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1540-0934
Seokyoung YoonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4695-2555
Miran KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5553-5334
Dukyong YoonDepartment of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1635-8376
Ajou University · KRCosmos Corporation (United States) · USYonsei University · KR

Funding

INNOPOLIS Foundation 2020-IT-RD-0140Korea Medical Device Development Fund 1711138152Korea Medical Device Development Fund KMDF_PR_20200901_0095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFetal well-being is usually assessed via fetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring during the antepartum period. However, the interpretation of FHR is a complex and subjective process with low reliability. This study developed a machine learning model that can classify fetal cardiotocography results as normal or abnormal. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn total, 17492 fetal cardiotocography results were obtained from Ajou University Hospital and 100 fetal cardiotocography results from Czech Technical University and University Hospital in Brno. Board-certified physicians then reviewed the fetal cardiotocography results and labeled 1456 of them as gold-standard; these results were used to train and validate the model. The remaining results were used to validate the clinical effectiveness of the model with the actual outcome.

resultsIn a test dataset, our model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.89 and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) of 0.73 in an internal validation dataset. An average AUROC of 0.73 and average AUPRC of 0.40 were achieved in the external validation dataset. Fetus abnormality score, as calculated from the continuous fetal cardiotocography results, was significantly associated with actual clinical outcomes [intrauterine growth restriction: odds ratio, 3.626 (

conclusionThe machine learning model developed in this study showed precision in classifying FHR signals. This suggests that the model can be applied to medical devices as a screening tool for monitoring fetal status.

Indexed as

CardiotocographyHeart Rate, FetalFemaleFetusHumansMachine LearningPregnancyPregnancy, High-RiskReproducibility of ResultsCardiotocographyhigh-risk-pregnancymachine learning

Identifiers

PMID35748081
PMCPMC9226828
OpenAlexW4283447004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.